Ground Vehicles **PROPOSED** RB battle rating changes

Game Discussion Realistic Battle
2583

Im also including the Ram tanks in the sherman list as they are basically lower tier jumbos, especially in playstyle.

Extra ton of weight, and lower top speed. Will get though gears faster on hilly terrain but as most maps are flat bowls at that BR the T-34 still wins overall. Far better reverse too.

this is from stock grinding, Im grinding the USSR tree and have moved on to the IS-2 now. Stock grinds for most other tanks ive played in germany and britain have been painful more than not. USSR was instantly more than competitive once i had parts.

1 Like
2584

???

The firefly is heavier than the M4A3 and has a worse engine. The Sherman II’s lower weight is also massively offset by the 20% less engine power.

5 vs 8 is hardly a massive difference in practice. Both die if they need to reverse.

Stock grinding doesn’t have to mean that much in terms of winrate. My French M4A3E2 is stock (6 games played) and sits at an 83% winrate.

Both of these tanks can easily be the same BR and honestly should be.

2 Likes
2585

was comparing the sherman 76 to the t34

still a 30% improvement, and it makes cresting from a hull down spot to shoot much safer, even with half the depression

it does for a lot of the vehicles ive played, however tbf thats primarily britain which gets screwed over a LOT

or extremely close, like 5.7 for the sherman and 6.0 for the T-34 ;-)

1 Like
2586

I mean I technically wouldn’t complain since it would make the M4A3 even more easy mode for me.

1 Like
2587

Centurion sure, most M60s are just bad though

2588

I flank and spank with centurions… they really arent that slow

2589

I just wanna say, the T-34’s armor strength does not come from T H I C Cness alone. It’s a complete volumetric black hole, being near completely impervious to HE, and occasionally tanking long 88mm to the face.

1 Like
2590

The T-34-85s aren’t under tiered… but okay lol.

3 Likes
2591

Are you trying to tell me there is a very good 6.7 Russian heavy tank?

I’m kinda confused what your getting at to be honest.

2592

They have low p/w and low top speeds

1 Like
2593

but very good gearing meaning its doing 22mph everywhere, youre getting to positions not far behind the others.

considering its a ww2 tank its keeping up with the designs of the 60s incredibly well

2 Likes
2594

Months later and I’m still wonder why these hand held tanks are still the br that they are:

IMG_2463
IMG_2462
IMG_2461
IMG_2460
IMG_2221
IMG_2458
IMG_2457
IMG_2456
IMG_2455
IMG_2454
IMG_2210
IMG_2212
IMG_2451
IMG_2209

2595

Because most of those are either average or trash. The Jumbos are just flat overtiered.

The only ones you can really make an argument for raising are the T26E5 and the T32, however neither of those are even the best at their BR and 6.7-8.3 is extremely compressed so you could make a case that pretty much any tank within that range should be raised.

1 Like
2596

I quite like the T34 and T26E1-1 both imo are pretty good at 6.7 T34 could definitely go to 7.0, I still have it when playing the M46 at 7.0

2597

How are any of these besides the T58 considered overpowered to you

2598

Have you played any of them?

2599

yes…

2600

Then you should know.

Especially since you have a 3.0 KDr in the T20, and T29, and something else.

I’m actually a little surprised you don’t do well in the Jumbos

Granted I myself have very old stats for the jumbos when I was a nub

2601

T20 at 6.3 is ok especially that 76mm doesn’t work that well against 7.3+ enemies

2 Likes
2602

I’ve seen people spam that a ton as of late and be at the top of the leaderboards.

Maybe a slight reload nerf is in order instead of a br change, but afaik most people regard it as a very good tank.