M14/41 can be placed lower yeah, since mobility advantage over M13/40 (III) is not that high, though personally I’m ok with it being 2.0, I find it quite enjoyable as well as AS42/47, mobility actually brings a lot for such fast firing cannon.
AB.43 and M15/42 would be perfect at 2.3 imo as they were at that BR in the past, Japanese Chi-HE maybe too.
They won’t be uptiered to 3.7 black hole, which is the main issue. Although maybe some decompression would be more preferable.
I remember @Conte_Baracca was active on Italian low tier changes, maybe he would like to share his opinion.
1 Like
I’m fine with AB 43 being 2.3. It’s a rat tank. It will make due.
I’m a little more insistent on the M15/42 being 2.0 with nerfs. It’s still objectively worse than the Pz. III J, which just does everything better. If that were to go up due to the decompression you mentioned, I’d be completely fine with it at 2.3.
Regardless, I’ll take what I can get ig for downtiers. Anything is better than nothing.
The T30 does absolutely NOT need to be raised in BR. it is perfectly balanced where it is. It’s reload time makes it extremely situational. And it’s armor is easily defeated when the enemy shoots its many many weak spots. Please leave it where it is. As it has been perfectly fine where it is since release.
2 Likes
The M14/41 also has a better armored driver’s hatch which covers a lot of the flat upper hull front. Meh. I think a lot of these BR’s are artificially high due to Italy tending to be played by more experienced players who are picking up a second or third tree.
Fair. I’m just saying what is in game. Accuracy and Italy do not go together in Gaijin’s world.
Let me known when you’ve got it all set, and @ me
Leopard 2A6, Leopard 2 PSO 12.7 → 12.3
T-90M 12.7 → 12.3
T-72B3A 12.3 → 12.0
IPM1 11.3 → 11.7
M1A2, M1A1 HC, M1A1 AIM, Click-Bait 12.0 → 12.3
BMPT 11.3 → 11.7
Object 906 8.0 → 8.3
TURM III 8.3 → 8.7
Pz.Kpfw. IV Ausf. J 3.7 → 3.3
AUBL 74 HVG 8.0 → 7.3
Churchill III 4.0 → 3.7
Waffenträger 5.7 → 5.3
2 Likes
This thing could go to 12.7 and be just fine
1 Like
man this thread is a joke, you’re seriously trying to argue that the t1e1 has better armour than a kv-220 crazy.
3 Likes
Please point out where he have said that
1 Like
M1A1 changes?
Goofy ahh changes
So, just my thoughts here.
Obj.906 is only good if your team lets the flank fold, which gives any light tank a good chance to be very effective. Also due to the loudness increase of all Soviet light tanks, and grits rather large size, I think it’s balanced perfectly at 8.0
Aubl 74 HVG doesn’t need a br decrease as crazy as it sounds, because it won’t make it any better. It merely needs a reload buff, to make it load as quick as 4.0 - 4.5 secs.
Then, my last thought is the Waffentrager, it’s a potent long 88mm at 5.7, you can pierce anything easily. Play it like a long range sniper and you’re golden. It’s very low profile and better than the Nashorn.
OH HELL NAW
6 Likes
Why do you disagree?
It is definitely on the strong side of 8.0 when it comes to light tanks.
It has mobility, full stabilizer and a 4.3s reload speed paired with APHE and HEAT-FS.
I wouldn’t mind it going to 8.3.
4 Likes
Just comparing it to the Char 25t is reason enough for it to go to 8.3. Apparently, getting a full stabilizer and access to HEATFS shells is not worthy of an increase in BR.
3 Likes
All of those tanks have very strong armor, like VERY strong armor. Drooping the kv1s to 4.3 and 4.0 would just make them invicible and at that point the bad gun doesnt matter. Kv220 is already notoriously good and doesntneed a buff
3 Likes