The difference is the F-16C has a radar and FCS compatible with AIM-7Ms, whereas the J-8F is not compatible with the PL-11. You really can’t wait 1-2 patches for it to get its PL-12s?
1 Like
Issue with the statement about the J-8F receiving the PL-12 is that it won’t be getting it anytime soon, and by the time we receive the PL-12 I highly doubt this thing will even be played. Gaijin has done this countless of times and eventually the equipment promised for a vehicle doesn’t actually come.
Best we can do is complain about this double standards and hopefully this will be forwarded (like spall lining)
The difference is the F-16C has a radar and FCS compatible with AIM-7Ms, whereas the J-8F is not compatible with the PL-11. You really can’t wait 1-2 patches for it to get its PL-12s?
Many vehicles have placeholder equipment and armament, this isn’t just a “cope session”. The issue is how long will it take and by that time will the J-8F still be prevalent and if not what’s the point on adding the PL-12?
Same could be said about the Gripen C for Sweden and you still see people rightfully advocating it to be in Sweden as well. Players shouldn’t wait 5 months for a vehicle to be balanced and thinking so is very selfish.
Me posting this is both a placeholder and balance thing
4 Likes
It was removed because people made bug reports proving J-8F couldn’t use Pl-11.
Well, it may be too late to do anything now, and it may get its PL-12 in the March update.
That’s my point, what was the purpose in removing a fictional yet perfectly balanced weapon loadout, only to add a seemingly fictional loadout to replace it? It doesn’t make a huge amount of sense because as far as we know the J-8F couldn’t use either of these loadouts, so why give it the less balanced one which is in opposition to the actual roles of the aircraft.
That’s not the issue. The issue is it will NEVER get PL12s. Look at the Chinese f100 event vehicle, what did Gaijin say about its 9js? If you saw that, then you know j8’s PL12s are likely never to come.
2 Likes
then you know j8’s PL12s are likely never to come
Exactly why I made this post! Gaijin is more likely to add a vehicle specifically for ARH missiles than introduce it to the J-8F.
This is exactly the reason why I thought the J-8C prototype or J-8B-II would’ve been a better choice to save this for whenever PL-12 is added.
The simplest solution for Gaijin would be to rename the vehicle to J-8H - minimal modelling work required for change while allowing Aspides.
1 Like
Cause the vehicle still needs the technical ability to be use the missile. Which the J-8F doesn’t.
Personally that’s why I’d rather see the J-8C. If I understand it correct the J-8C led to the J-8F and the J-8D led to the J-8H. So changing it to a J-8C would be basically just making it into a pseudo-prototype for the J-8F that it is currently
2 Likes
Aim-9J’s were withheld so it could be added at a lower BR. Furthermore it has nothing to do with this topic.
They literally stated that it will get ARH missiles when everyone else gets them.
J8F will never fit the meta. Even when it gets pl12s the br will probably go higher and its airframe is heavily outdated compared to teh 4th gens with amraams it will be facing.
I mentioned above that it will be dead by the time we receive the PL-12, it will be best to receive the PL-11 now and give the PL-12 to another Chinese vehicle (like the J-11 or J-10).
J8F will never fit the meta. Even when it gets pl12s the br will probably go higher and its airframe is heavily outdated compared to teh 4th gens with amraams it will be facing.
Fr, the J-8F will be fighting F-15EXs by the time we receive the PL-12
1 Like
Both loadouts stated cannot physically exist in real life without technical alterations, altering a pylon to fit and use a missile it never carried nor could use is no different to altering a radar to lead a missile it never interacted with.
It can’t use the Pl-11.
Only the Pl-11 has been proven to be unable to be use by J-8F. No has proven it can’t use the Pl-8.
1 Like
Nowhere have I so far seen anyone claim that the PL-8 to have been used on the extra two pylons that gaijin have implemented it on in game. The idea of the J-8F holding and using 6x PL-8s is purely fictional, and purely by the design of Gaijin. The loadout of holding Two extra PL-8s is as fictional as the loadout of holding two PL-11s. Pylons are what connect the missile to the plane, and are just as important as the missiles themselves, they are not always interchangeable and most certainly not in this case.
1 Like
How about give j8f pl8a with irccm so we arent totally f*cked when the patch drops and we’re facing the swarm of f15 and su27s
1 Like