Yeah, and? I didn’t say it should be higher, on the contrary 11.3 is the max BR for this vehicle. Higher it will be shit beacuse of mobility.
This tank is just simply a very poor event reward in my opinion.
1 Like
You’re comparing a tank to another that is 1.3BR above it. At 11.0 this event vehicle is certainly no joke. Quite a few players play 11.0 USSR just for the T-90A, so this will add more line-up depth for them. Complaints should be around the vehicle not being very unique or interesting, since it’s another T72 event vehicle. But this is what we get for moving away from the difficult build-a-bear events (i.e, Object279 event), to these ‘easy’ events, i guess.
1 Like
Yup. Maybe craft events were kinda shitty and hard but they often had really nice tanks.
1 Like
Gaijin decided that it’s APS is somehow worth two BR steps, which I don’t really agree with.
I think unique things should be pretty much in TTs for the most part, with some semi-unique stuff sprinkled around as premiums/events.
1 Like
For TT please. 🙏
Could go to 11.7 easily.
No reason to ever share the same BR with M1A1.
2 Likes
Because an increase in vertical and horizontal traverse, the addition of thermal sights, a better APFSDS round and a niche APS somehow warrants a 1.4 BR increase over the T-72B '89?
They both have the same armour, same survivability, same mobility, same reload and same gun depression.
3 Likes
Inb4 “that thing should be moved up to 10.7”
4 Likes
You don’t have to be a good cook to tell someone their food is bad or good, though I do admit I do not play Russia at that B.R.
With your logic a lot of posts on this forum would be null and void.
would be? SHOULD be!
lots of clueless people spewing insane asylum babble on this forum
5 Likes
Opinions from someone with limited knowledge is generally considered to have no value bro
3 Likes
I mean, loads of posts in here aren’t even worth the bandwidth they’re using.
5 Likes
Yes, that’s the point…
You’d cut 90% of the bad takes if people actually played the tank that they’re complaining about themselves.
5 Likes
Is this a decent line up filler or should I skip this? I have 10 crew slots for a few nations and Russia is one of them.
Skip it. Its not worth it.
1 Like
could be worth it for like 15 gjn it will sell for
Thank you. I will consider both options. It may be worth grinding for future sale since I play the game a ton already.
Which you would think is good, but if you cut the enemy team’s side out of the discussion then you will end up in a echo chamber. It is infeasable to go through everyone’s play history and say ‘you can’t comment on this vehicle’ when that vehicle impacts the very game they play, especially when the vehicle has not even come out yet.
‘‘Enemy side’’ ?
I don’t think you understand what I’m saying.
Let’s say there’s Person X that argues the Marder III H is too strong, and Person Y that thinks it’s too weak.
Both players have played the Marder III H and have a decent discussion about it because both parties having at least some understanding of the pros and cons of the vehicle.
However, if you get Person Z that argues it’s too strong but has never played it themselves, and only faced it whilst playing British tanks, they form a distorted view and over-inflated opinion of it simply because the vehicle has fantastic penetration and will one-hit-kill their British tank on the first shot.
I have no problem with persons X and Y, it’s person Z I have a problem with.
It also makes no sense to claim that this would form an echo chamber given that X and Y can still disagree with eachother.
I’m also not saying Person Z can’t voice their opinions, it’s just that I discard their opinions because they’re talking from a point of complete ignorance on the subject.