Boring. I Guess Is Just another even to skip
Like what? Only turret(irrelevant) and engine changes? Unless engine suddenly gives final 5+ hp/t more than TT version it is also irrelevant. It still functionally and gameplay wise will be the same vehicle. Ah yes reminder that some vehicles get copecage and engine as a module upgrade. (M1128 and T-72B3)
I have it, but it’s mostly a mid-range ambush weapon imo. It’s possible to get kills at a kilometer, but only if the enemy is sideways or really light.
It’s certainly not a bad thing to have, but I don’t feel like 14.5mm protection is gonna save it when you’re fired on while sniping lol
sounds not bad,but i afraid if the gun is computer controllable has no relation to if it will get a FCS.
Did the M60A1 RISE have computer controllable cannon?the new prem M60A1 still got a FCS and even a Driver System which rarely got in a MBT.
Agreed. We can essentially get the same vehicle but shorter quite easily as WT already has it modelled in the files
also because RARDEN is underperforming at range, its APDS has too little pen at range
14.5mm protected from any angle frontally
this will also translate into protection against 20mms (HVAP at any frontal angle, because HVAP, and APDS at angles) and other smaller guns at angles
1 Like
That’s not really an issue at the BR to be honest.
I have gotten 2km sniped on mediums before on maps like el Alamein though.
Mobility (not getting shot) is best armour. And unless it’s a 35mm SPAA spammer it’s usually on you if you die
Guess we are forgetting the completely new hull with composite applique said turret is now sitting on…
80% chance it wont
Sounds promising, but I also like to use the APHE for damage and consistency.
I think this is only going to be somewhat true as there are usually places to slip in. Take how the AMX-13 is mostly 40mm proof frontally, but there are gaps.
It’s not the BR, you are correct. The vehicle is just awkward. It’s cool, though.
This one is a bit stretched. Most of the maps are either too far-ranged for the Rarden or too close to catch someone off-guard reliably. Not to mention the random guy that makes it his life mission to end you personally with CAS after you slight him once.
Ah! You see the strikeshield APS has been broken far longer than that! Ever since it was added with the kf41 infact :)
Strikeshield now works. Been helping my CRV against heli spam
What’s the BR?
Best guess I have is 8.3
So, there was no reason to add vehicles such as the M1A2 SEPv3, Leopard 2A7 or T-80BVM since “It still functionally and gameplay wise will be the same vehicle”?
What about vehicles such as the Pz.IV F2, M4A2 (76) W & BT-7M? Why were they added in the first place then? They also only adds small chances onto other vehicles.
The Scimitar Mk.2 has a completely different hull compared to the tech tree Scimitar. And i don’t mean modified, they literally fitted the turret onto another type of hull to increase survivability against threats such as IEDs.
A lot of the vehicles that have been added to the game, are functionally similar or same in regards to their functionality or gameplay, but that is no reason for them not to be in the game.
2 Likes
Maybe if it got the APFSDS that there’s no evidence of actually being used.
With standard APDS it’s an 8.0, warrior is 8.3 with the same gun but also Milan 2, better armour too and comparable mobility
1 Like
Its Gaijin. Currently expecting it to be 8.7
(though as It will be my main scout in my 9.3 lineup. I dont mind that much)
Shir 2 excuse
Shir 2 never had access to L23, or even L23A1 (base L23 is fake lmao)
they should add a Scimitar LEP in tech tree, Mk.2 can be more unique with the Rheinmetall APFSDS
1 Like
If this thing gets placed at 8.3 without an APFSDS round, it’s gonna be turned into scrap metal by the PT-76-57