Get the Scimitar Mk.2 in the Scimitar Strike Event!

EDIT:

Smin has replied and provided us with clarification and instructions on how to address issues with closed and/or locked bug reports. Thank you again Smin:

My original message:

@Stona_WT @Smin1080p_WT Seriously, the company needs to have an all hands on deck meeting with the bug reporting managers. The bug reporting managers LOCKING nearly every single bug report is a waste of time, and is seriously harming the game and company. Not allowing the author of the bug report to add more information is EXTREMELY offensive and VERY counterproductive.

Enough is enough. Gaijin needs to get their bug reporting managers and bug reporting system in order without delay.

9 Likes

Im remaking it and explaining it far better.

The first should have been accepted. second should have. as should third.

6 Likes

Yeah, and you shouldn’t be forced to create 3 or 4 “duplicate” reports simply because the bug reporting managers are “lazy” and simply lock down each and every report as soon as they read them. It is SO counterproductive. It needs to stop, immediately.

8 Likes

its a lot of reading, i get not wanting to read it but it is all relevant info

4 Likes

i have taken offense to this. Im not the only person thats worked on this report, its a slap in the face for three of us as we all know that this is more than enough info

6 Likes

I couldnt agree more

5 Likes

I have now been banned from the bug reporting site…

If they dont want the thermal gen to change for game balance they could just say so

6 Likes

How did you get banned??? That’s insane.

5 Likes

if i gave my thoughts im getting banned here.

5 Likes

Pm’d you.

3 Likes

EDIT:

Smin has replied and provided us with clarification and instructions on how to address issues with closed and/or locked bug reports. Thank you again Smin:

My original message:

@Stona_WT @Smin1080p_WT This is unacceptable! He did not break any rules. He was forced to create new bug reports BECAUSE the bug reporting managers locked all of his previous reports. THEY forced him to create new reports. What else are we supposed to do when they lock the bug reports and block us from responding or adding more info?!

They even added the label themselves showing “Not enough info”!

image

HOW ELSE ARE WE SUPPOSED TO ADD MORE INFO WHEN THE BUG REPORT IS LOCKED AND WE ARE UNABLE TO ADD MORE INFO TO THE EXISTING REPORTS?!

image

This is a critical situation. This needs to be addressed and remedied immediately. These actions by the bug reporting managers are beyond unacceptable.

Thank you for your time and attention to this matter. Please help us come to a resolution that is positive and constructive for everyone involved.

7 Likes

To add to this, 2 sources in the said report mention the desired thermal imager and it still gets not a bugged because they aren’t reading his sources.

8 Likes

I think they are but arent understanding them or the total picture thats pretty easy to put together from the mass of information.

6 Likes

It’s unbelievable.We’ll see how this game ends.What is clear is that it’s nothing short of astonishing that someone can have their reports closed for submitting them, only to be banned for submitting another report with new information.

As I’ve been saying for a while now, the reporting system isn’t working properly.

4 Likes

Remember the Devs want US to spend money on docs and then freely hand them over for their gain just to prove their “sources” are not truthful.

7 Likes

Seriously, I’m going to become a game developer.

2 Likes

Careful, you can get banned for remarks like this.

Not judging or discounting your or anyone elses frustration. Just providing a polite heads up.

2 Likes

Well, look, I’m going to take your advice, mainly because I was recently banned, they just deleted another post of mine without saying anything to me, and at the moment I don’t really want to be banned from writing.

Hello

Spamming duplicate reports with the same sources is against the rules. Spam requires even more moderation time or in this case, QA’s time to handle the same report again.

Reports should not be remade with the exact same sources when its already been answered what the issues are with the current sources and what is needed to clarify.

I have removed the ban for spam on the understanding that the exact same report will not simply be remade again.

We had already previously responded to this here on the forum that the issue was with none of the current sources being directly clear A) On what Scimitar variant was in Question B) What generations of thermals was referred too on the sources speaking generally on Scimitar Mk 2 upgrades.

In the event of a report being closed for suspected misunderstanding, the correct procedure for a re-review is to contact any Technical Moderator via PM. Not simply repost the report with the exact same sources.

4 Likes

I understand that i broke the rules. I am quite fustrated with the responses i have gotten from the mods on the CBR site

thanks for this, In the future can we leave reports open to edit for the OP so such problems dont happen again?

The sources are clear however the devs have gotten the wrong end of the stick for context. The devs take my reported specs as being an upgraded Scimitar Mk2 however that is not the case.

SCIMITAR MK2 IS THE UPGRADE, all the times where the improved specs of the mk2 are called “upgrades” are in comparison to the Scimitar MK1 and its upgrades.

the Scimitar Forward Recce Vehicle upgrade is the spec mk2 was built to in 2010-2011, but is also the spec that some scimitar mk1 hulls were upgraded to for service in Afghanistan. This is probably where confusion is coming from, a lot of the media of the time isnt the clearest in which is which.

11 Likes