common WT mistake
1 Like
Closely followed by “angle your damn tiger bro”.
or “why the fuk are you taking PzGr 39 over PzGr”
or “why the hell did you just dive on a half dead flaming bomber whos missing all his engines”
1 Like
Funnily enough, I never had that problem. I just knew to play the Tiger properly. I knew to angle, not rush everything, and use my gun to my advantage by staying at long range. It’s a really good tank. Idk how people say it’s bad.
My friend does this 😭 I take PzGr as my main and a few PzGr 39 just in case.
1 Like
1 Like
Ima be honest. I hate the Panther. I’m just not a fan of it. Sure the armor is decent and the gun has good pen, but that post pen damage 🤮
VK3002M was relatively fun back when i played it last, but the turret traverse makes me think i might as well main a Pz.IV instead 😭😭😭
Ima be real. Hate that thing. I prefer the Panther D over it.
darn i liked it,
but i havent played it since the weight nerf so it might be shit now
I don’t think it’s necessarily bad, but it’s just not my style.
i like the Russian tonks a lot too
I think im like the only person who enjoys the T-34(1941) more than any other 76mm T-34 in the game
If it wasn’t actually fired by that vehicle, it almost surely won’t be added.
I don’t think it will be. It’s at rank VI, the EFV was 9.3 (now 9.0) when it came out and it’s not a prem.
Doesnt stop gaijin giving 200 billion other vehicles ammunition they didnt fire.
It was intended, it was accepted, it was just cancelled because the MoD went “well, we could… but we literally have no threats on the immediate horizon and CT40 is coming so not needed”.
1 Like
WT classic
1 Like
Bruh I’m in my mid 20s…
1 Like
you are no fossil :)
tells you someone older
I’m hoping the additional armor is a removable modification like on some other vehicles.
2 Likes
its very generous to call Scimitar agile tho.
And yet again its event vehicle that is copypaste. Cute, but copypaste.