I want it.
2 Likes
If it’s anything like the Aubl 74 HVG it will be crap.
They still need to Buff the aubls reload to 4.25 secs to be satisfactory. And then it will be a balanced 8.0 light tank.
Especially given its mobility now adays is lacking compared to other vehicles.
Why do we get a light tank 3 times in a row, it’s start to feel very boring!
Radkampfwagen 90, Class 3, Boxer MGS… they all play and feel the same at a different BR
Also Vilkas is just a worse CV90 MK4.
2 Likes
Germany is not allowed a decent light vehicle, Puma is just mediocre, Marder 2 would be the only unique and interesting addition.
2 Likes
They gave the R-400 a turret basket… meanwhile, russian turrets still turn on magic.
bad reverse, 9.3 gun vs 2S38’s, BMD-4’s, BMP-3, T-80UD…etc yikes
1st pen and your turret travers is gone, minimum.
Actually it should be “Deutsches Heer”. Mixing english and German doesn’t really make sense here
It’s crazy the HVG still has a 10 second reload for a 60mm cannon and projectiles that weigh the same as a bottle of water, especially when that 60mm apfsds round has worse post pen damage than a 30mm autocannon.
That is never happening.
1 Like
God, please no turret basked. All tanks with this BS thing are unplayable.
1 Like
The fcs module is worse tbh, as it disables literally everything and gets disabled by the power-system being destroyed…
Not to mention that the way they modelled it is insulting at best.
1 Like
Here’s me crying for leopard 1a3 or 1a4 xd
No they aren’t, as well as this more vehicles are going to get them.
the VBCI for france is a pain at 9.3 for that stuff
Repair times always like 35 seconds for one of these new items.
Leopards f.e. also have a manual, emergency mode in case some of these systems fail. They can simply switch it off the move the turret without FCS, where they want. Even into the rear deadzone.
1 Like
Snail was faster
Just wait until they add the “no aim, no shoot” policy to MBT’s aswell.
I’m not gonna lie, I look forward to it, because the backlash will hopefully be severe enough to revert this demented design on all other lights (that dont have crewless turrets ofc) aswell…
It’s completely stupid to shove every possible functionality into a singular module, that is often not given a damn about and just shoved in there with 0 effort or regard to historical accuracy (see: Leopard 2K, PT 16/PT 14(mod.), Begleitpanzer 57 mm, etc.) while the game has absolutely NONE of these functionalities modelled; (I dont think they should be added to be completely honest but thats a different topic)
Automatic Lead? - Nope
Inertial-Tracking? - Nope
Ballistics compensation? - Nope
I’d be completely fine with the FCS getting destroyed resulting in Stabilizers, Thermals/NVD, IRST, LWS etc. being disabled
But aiming and firing the gun? Thats just completely absurd, especially for vehicles that literally do not even have any interface between the sight and the fcs directly, i.e. use periscopic sighting equipment.
(Such as: TH 400, Leopard 2K, Begleitpanzer 57 mm, etc.)
And there are WAY too many vehicles that will have their firing ability disabled, when one of sometimes 3-4 sights total gets destroyed… Like hello? Do we consider that backup sights might be intended as backups for the other sights?
TH 400 is a good example here aswell, as the commander sight (currently modelled together into the FCS with everything else) literally has its’ own electronics block that serves the same purpose as that provided for the gunner’s sight…
6 Likes
But surely it’s historically accurate, right? That was the main argument for all of this crap afterall, surely they wouldnt just make stuff up…
(gun is flipped because it’s an older blueprint, some internal bulkheads arent shown)
oooh woops
7 Likes
I mean it’s gaijin man, good intentions half implemented xD
the turret baskets are a given as well, like they are just changing the models to be narrower and taller or fatter and smaller.
the VBCI has a stupidely huge turret basket inside as well which even 50 cals can disable leaving it completely useless.
Yes, I said it was the extended chassis of the TAM.
Perhaps because I used a translator, it wasn’t understood. It was never equipped with a 120mm cannon.
The following armed vehicles were made from the TAM family:
VC TAM (Combat Vehicle) Turret and 105mm cannon.
VCTP TAM (Personnel Transport Combat Vehicle) Turret and 20mm Rh202 cannon.
VCA TAM (Artillery Combat Vehicle) Turret and 155mm cannon. Extended chassis.
VCTM TAM (Mortar Combat Transport Vehicle) 120mm mortar.
VCLC TAM (Rocket Combat Vehicle) LAR-160 (160mm) and MAR-350 (350mm) rockets
VCDCA-30 Dragon (Anti-Aircraft Defense Combat Vehicle) Turret and twin 30mm cannons with radar.
Added to this are all the Marders.
1 Like
Weirdly it’s true to the style of badge they’re ribbing off
I don’t think they’re official patches, but they do look quite pleasant, not a bad concept for a decal IMO (The store where Smin’s photos are from)
1 Like