Why are we still arguing about this
1 Like
In combat? No. Did they obtain and transport to the US for testing? Yes. And now they sit in US Museums
1 Like
To be fair, smin did say that aussie and Canadian vehicles would be added wherever they were needed.
That does imply that Russia could get one of their vehicles if there was a need for them at one point.
Top tier Air is so diverse (at least in RB) that it’s not even like one nation vs another, nowhere near the way it is in GRB (and how that can make balancing really difficult).
I don’t even expect as an American who appreciates USSR kit/gear/etc. to have the common opinion on the English forums. I just basically would like everyone to admit there is no real logic to Gaijin’s decisions and they are entirely arbitrarily decided and border on capriciousness.
I guess we should expect T-80BVM or T-90M etc. in French techtree since these vehicles wouldnt be put into service without French support
Multiple nations have premiums or individual vehicles within them from other nations. That’s not indicative of sub trees they may or may not get.
India was added, as I mentioned, because we planned to introduce Indian vehicles into War Thunder.
3 Likes
When the US gets an Iranian F-14, it’s good. When the USSR wants an Indian MiG, it’s childish and sad. What’s wrong with you?
3 Likes
No functioning Su-27 with radar or fire control, and nothing after that. MiG-29, a host of 15-23’s… Cool, have em. I can’t stand anything until the 21 anyways, and Germany has all those planes in their TT as well anyhow.
Again, the argument I’m putting forth is that by the logic of balancing gameplay (used for the Bhishma) for a specific nation, is the primary motivating reason for a vehicle’s placement.
1 Like
And yet here you all are, without the vehicle and bitching up a storm.
3 Likes
Ok then if that the case, Can we have the Canadian Leo then ?
You know whats funny, they don’t even bother adding the soviet non export variants, like the tor, mi28a, and the late mig21
1 Like
There are multiple British designed or produced Indian vehicles in game and possible overall. The other ones added were to introduce additional playstyles and variety to the British tree.
You hit the nail on the head.
I would really like to see moderation curtailing insults to players of the game based on the nations they enjoy. It’s tiring.
If you want to get granular, they were produced under license in Saint Petersburg. At that rate, we’re really gonna mess a lot of trees up.
T-80BVM and T-90M no longer need the Katharine sights, as they have newer thermals, and they could’ve functioned without them.
IRIAF F-14’s would not have been airworthy for as long as they have been without support from the USSR.
Then don’t make stupid claims,
Simple : )
1 Like
Im not even sure what you are asking here. Australia and Canada have no vehicles that would be introduced into the USSR tree.
This also has no relation to the vehicle in this event. Russia has no connection to it.
2 Likes
Bro speak English, this ain’t the Russian forum, I ain’t looking that up to translate. If you can read my English, write back in it.
No one insulted me personally in this thread for what I said.
But the general toxicity is here, and shouldn’t be.
He’s been like that all day better just to put him in time out : )
Britain has Australian non-premium vehicles tho and so far the Indian vehicles were only premiums, event and squadron vehicles.
I’m having trouble understanding how India ended up becoming a subtree when there are only random vehicles thrown into the tree
2 Likes