Then don’t make stupid claims,
Simple : )
1 Like
Im not even sure what you are asking here. Australia and Canada have no vehicles that would be introduced into the USSR tree.
This also has no relation to the vehicle in this event. Russia has no connection to it.
2 Likes
Bro speak English, this ain’t the Russian forum, I ain’t looking that up to translate. If you can read my English, write back in it.
No one insulted me personally in this thread for what I said.
But the general toxicity is here, and shouldn’t be.
He’s been like that all day better just to put him in time out : )
Britain has Australian non-premium vehicles tho and so far the Indian vehicles were only premiums, event and squadron vehicles.
I’m having trouble understanding how India ended up becoming a subtree when there are only random vehicles thrown into the tree
2 Likes
R27
2 Likes
The TOR wouldn’t have even be that great, but why the hell isn’t it in the USSR TT? It could be a gun-less and less useful (due to min engagement range, size, and launch angle) radar-missile SPAA. Like a super-strela. Would niche in nicely so you don’t have to stretch your lineup to squeeze in the Pantsir, or play down, due to BR by sticking to the Tunguska.
1 Like
How about the IIAF skin?
100% sure that most players are seeking the pre-revolution skin for the Imperial Iran Air Force!
Please consider this comment and reply,
Thank you,
Well yeah, we (whoever that is) could, if gaijin felt like it was needed
This is very much off topic at this stage, but I will answer your question for the last time here on this. Please take it elsewhere if you wish to continue.
Australian and Canadian vehicles do not have a sub tree. Therefor they can go wherever to any tree premium or not. Being a premium or TT is not a restriction.
Indian vehicles so far have been premium or event, but India is a designated sub tree nation of the UK meaning all of their vehicles will go there, premium, squadron, tree or otherwise.
3 Likes
Highlight, right-click, translate. He’s basically saying when Western nations get a USSR vehicle, everyone rejoices. When people even unofficially talk about USSR getting western vehicles, people lose their sh*t. He’s pointing out the double standard.
4 Likes
Yes, with no Sedjil, R-27R1, avatar, or IRIAF skin. This is how it should be done.
R-27 can be found in the German, British, Chinese and Italian tree.
Much like how almost every nation has a vehicle with an AIM-9 at some stage, a missile is not a tie to a nation or a set designated home. Just because something has an AIM-9 Sidewinder, doesn’t mean it belongs to the US tree. Equally a jet that has an R-27, is not set in stone to belong to the Russian / USSR tree.
9 Likes
If the experimental camouflage is the IRIAF, so what is the default camouflage then?
Didn’t ever have it? I would imagine the F-14D would’ve.
Will the USSR see the same diversity based on relative alliance/geolocation/etc in the future as other nations have?
But I was asking for the IIAF camouflage, the original one that came with it for the first time.
USSR will get a even better MiG-21 anyway
It’s more effort than I’m willing to put out, read the room.
Literally, almost no one I’ve seen rejoices when a western nation gets USSR gear. EVERYONE always wants their own crap. I’ve yet to see a single Brit rejoice over the bishma. Or any of them, most do these nations have their own, or joint produced gear they could use. Over and over again they say how stupid it is for USSR gear ending up in other trees.
I agree with it. Britain should have gotten the 2a4Can. Germany shouldn’t be getting British made Swiss owned planes. Nations should be getting the crap that’s theirs, and not other nations unless they assign it as a sub tree specifically. And even that can get iffy sometimes in my opinion.
So he’s barking up the wrong tree, I’ve firmly been against that exact type of stuff. My originally comment even said “cut the BS, stop adding more of it.”