Get the Iranian F-14A IRIAF in the ‘Persian Tomcat’ event

Official News, Development Blogs and Updates
613

Nice strawmans there again buddy, its a simple fact that u replied to a chain talking about.
This comment is from the same chain.

This is not an answer. Why is soviet equipment, which has nothing to do with Great Britain, and belongs to the independent state of India, placed in a british tree?

But even so. Your logic still makes no sense, tech tree/subtree isnt the same as no representation. Germany/India isnt in the same situation as Iran in terms of TT/ST.
So IRIAF F-14 for USA and German MiG-29G for USSR isnt the same.

614

Well the benefit on WT is that its always changing so more stuff could be added down the road or even more TT.

615

It’s not, no. But you’re basing the USSR not getting the F14 on Iran’s ties with the US at the time it was sold to Iran. Yet, the British tree having post-revolution Indian vehicles shows that alliance doesn’t matter.

2 Likes
616

It was clear from the start that Canada and Australia only had Western equipment in their arsenal. But India had both Western and Eastern equipment. So what was the point of making India a subtree of Britain, but not Canada and Australia? Can we expect in the future that the USSR will receive modern tanks (planes) from Australia and Canada?

2 Likes
618

I want to ask. Is Czechoslovakia/Slovakia subtree of USSR?

1 Like
619

Bruh what the hell ?

620

Exactly. See how warped this is?

All Gaijin decisions are essentially arbitrary.

Admittedly, I just wanted to dunk on people in a tomcat without the jingoistic US crap, and maybe a unique SARH like the Sedjil.

If the IRIAF F-14 was in the USSR tree instead of the US tree, we’d have just the same amount of ass-hurt.

At this point it’s best to let it go and move on, as annoying as this is.

1 Like
621

They should’ve made the UK a subtree of India or pakistan considering all

622

Like you got 14 or so T-80s you don’t need them

623

The MAIN weapon ?!
The MAIN weapon that it cannot fire IRL ?
And we’re conveniently going to ignore the AIM-9, the AIM-54, the HAWK derivatives AND the fact that this plane is american to begin with ?

2 Likes
624

Its pretty clear hes just butthurt. And its even funnier that its about something that was never going to happen.

1 Like
625

German mig29 doesn’t use American missiles

626

Not only that but Iran isn’t a sub which people seems to forgot

627

India is a subtree, thus considered a single “block” of vehicles grouped together. Considering history/etc, India being a British subtree makes the most sense overall.

This just happens to come along with some more modern eastern designs.

628

Why not, lmao. Give the USSR a Strv-122, a Leo 2A6, and an M1A1SA at this point. For the sake of balance, the USSR needs tanks with 5 second reload, gen 3 thermals, and a working reverse transmission.

2 Likes
629

Now ya all being mental insane for no reason.

630

Is Switzerland a subtree of germany?

631

Yes, the weapon that was reworked out of necessity for long range in the 80’s and 90’s, which was a completely different missile in many aspects by the time it was done, compared to the MIM-23.

You also forget, and thank God gaijin did too, that it could likely fire R-73’s as well.

1 Like
632

Then lets go ahead and give the US nearly every jet the USSR built. Go ahead and open that can of worms and see how it pans out for you.

1 Like
633

Yup yup.

It’s always a “s*** on USSR players” theme here. Plenty of memes and “cry about it” in this thread alone. The toxic nature of players towards those who enjoy USSR is just… childish and sad. It destroys any actual discussion.

I mean forgive me for wanting to play the F-14 without the handicap of having to play with US mains. It’s not like the USSR getting the Iranian F-14 would be unprecedented lol

1 Like