maybe you dont but Gaijin and most people clearly do
Can we get a statement on why India was chosen instead of Australia as a subtree for Britain?
2 Likes
Damn, that was why American and Germans grabbed all of the juicy parts of the Canadian and Australian army. Xd
1 Like
No you are just adding context to where you think it needs to be to continue an argument that isnt even there.
? Iran is a pretty modern country. You can’t have a nuclear program if everyone is living in dirt huts
India was not chosen over anything else. Indian vehicles were simply being introduced to the game.
They were not chosen “instead of” anything else.
1 Like
But will it have a ballistic computer for the rocket… that thing is going to make a big boom lol.
1 Like
How did India become a subtree then? Britain had multiple Australian vehicles for years
1 Like
My wonder is why it went to GB when all the vehicles added have been Russian and India severed it’s ties with GB long before those vehicles were made?
1 Like
tell me who besides the manufacturer is able to reprogram the Analogue Ballistic computer on this 70s plane on this aircraft to include this rocket?
id be surprised if they were able to even acess the program
I would think they had the largest available vehicle selection that could help out the UK tree and fill in gaps that were needed. Game balancing
Analogue makes that easier tbh
Happy birthday! Smin
3 Likes
IDK but they have hacked the computer for the f-14 and have made software modifications. Its possible they could have gotten russian tech support tbh. They probably jumped at the chance to get their hands on it.
That’s a country, not a person Mike, just so you know. I’ll let you answer your own question.
And yeah, I see a US made plane, only in service due to Iranian and Soviet support, which shot down other US supplied planes to another country in the 80’s that was carrying out US geopolitical aspirations, and maintains direct opposition to the US, so yes, makes great sense.
Also correct, but also rumored to be arriving. You think it would be appropriate in the US or Israeli trees? LMAO. Come on Death, you’re better than that bro.
Ah yes, and Iranian produced weapon. Also, we both know loadouts aren’t entirely accurate nor reflective of typical combat loads (8xAIM-120 on F-15, looking at you).
IRIAF, do you know what it means? If not, let me help you. ISLAMIC Republic of Iran Air Force. This is not the Shah’s Iran. I understand what you are trying to say, but you are simply incorrect. If Gaijin wants to give the F-14 in Iranian skin to the US, it should be the IIAF F-14, with all domestic (US) weapons (essentially a premium skinned F-14).
IRIAF is post revolution, with stickers, profile pictures, and history of Fighter Pilots who may have started under the IIAF (many defected or were killed post revolution), but continued under the IRIAF. This is like taking PLA historical figures and mentioning what an asset they were to the KMT. Total backwards, and frankly lazy, the more I think on it.
Well, if they did, then isn’t it weird that not a single one of them has been added yet? The Bhishma is nice to have, but wasn’t needed at all and there were plenty of alternatives.
So does than mean a nations isn’t limited to one sub and could have multiple say like 5 ?
India’s situation, be that over time, internally, or external relationships, is not a direct comparison to Iran.
Nice strawmans there again buddy, its a simple fact that u replied to a chain talking about.
This comment is from the same chain.
This is not an answer. Why is soviet equipment, which has nothing to do with Great Britain, and belongs to the independent state of India, placed in a british tree?
But even so. Your logic still makes no sense, tech tree/subtree isnt the same as no representation. Germany/India isnt in the same situation as Iran in terms of TT/ST.
So IRIAF F-14 for USA and German MiG-29G for USSR isnt the same.
Well the benefit on WT is that its always changing so more stuff could be added down the road or even more TT.