I rarely, see anyone that isnt a WoT fan bring it up on here.
its really clutching at straws.
And no most folks ive seen bring it up call it the Emil.
EDIT: im also done with this topic youve genuinely no counter arguments as to why this thing should be added and were on a topic with absolutely no corrolation to sweden at all.
Some I know on the forum, who is literally Swedish calls it the Krangvagn too…
You started the whole conversation, I made the simple statement they missed an opportunity.
one person calls it that okay. read what i said, i never said no one calls it that just that most ive seen call it an emil.
again make some relevant points as to why it should be added or stop
Scuse me you dont seem to understand how conversations start.
YOU have effectively and literally started this conversation by saying that.
Its not a missed oppurtunity.
You also corrected me to say as if Emil was the wrong name when militarily the documents we have access to call it Emil.
again, you began this in a thread about Shir 2.
Dont say i began the conversation
Can someone confirm. Do premium vehicles and/or premium accounts boost your mission points reward or no? I see most WT content creators saying yes but then a lot of people in the comments saying no.
Depend on what you mean by “mission points reward” as those are three different things.
If you just mean how much mission score you get for a specific action, no, i do not believe so.
If you mean the reward amount in RP and SL you get for each specific action then yes.
“Mission points reward” doesn’t really exist.
There are: “mission scores”, “Research points” and “Silver lion rewards”.
I mean for the event. The points you get for the event rewards. Like 25000 every 2 days. Do u get more points per game if you use a premium or no?
No.
That is based on mission score, so no.
The things that affect the score’s size is:
Your performance in the match gives you the base score.
The game mode you are playing then multiplies that base score with either x1 for Arcade, x1.33 for Realistic or x1.8 for Simulator (unsure if the multipliers are the same for Air Events).
The rank of the vehicle you are playing, rank I-IV: x0.8 (Note, at ranks I-III you get zero score unless the vehicle used is an event vehicle), V: x1 , VI: x1.1 , VII-VIII: x1.2 .
As far as i understand it those are the only factors that affect the score you receive for the event marks.
Yeah was wonderin why people said to use prems as it generated more score. But i think they mean use premiums as itll generate you more RP and SL throughout the grind !
is it not the same as nato names for russian fighters for example ???
Where nato calls it x and then russia calls it something else ??
is it not something as simple as this, 1 person calls it by the original designation and the other by the “NATO Callsign” for example ??
depends, Its different in the context of the Emil series as the name Krangvagn was used by the swedish to hide it, due to the nature of the 1950s.
The real military used name IS the Emil and the 93 page document i was reading ( i mentioned above) calls it as such.
The way NATO is identifying say soviet fighters of the time was to prevent confusion as due to the Soviet, warssaw and chinese naming systems.
For example, the Flanker. Its easier to say than a designation of it especially in the heat of the moment.
Russia doesnt call them flankers they call it a su27 or sukhoi 27 ( in russian ofc and they will ahve their own nicknames I assume)
Su25 for example, frogfoot. Its called that for easy, quick identification over saying SU25 sukhoi 25, cause even a simple miss digit or even miss hearing could lead to people believing that a totally different air craft or vehicle is there.
If my calculations are correct you need 41666 points/day to have this tank tradable. Roughly 25 battles/day.
Tradable now days means doubled time spent.
I’ll pass with no regret. Unreasonable requirements.
Can someone please explain to me why the L15A5 has the same penetration values as the damn L15A3 which is a far older and worse round?
the L15A5 by indication of firing tests of the round, and the fact it has a tungsten core over copper cobolt in the L15A3 should give it higher penetration.
Does anyone have access to credible ballistics test comparing the two rounds? seeing as the service round for the mk5 and above chieftain is L15A5
NGL, I assume gaijin just went qwasi “meh” mode on this 1, no ammunition designed for the Iranians, an L23 round that isnt really what it should be (cough) and way beyond the tanks timeframe arguably and an L15 copy-paste round.
Feels rushed and not thought out.
I still advocate gaijin shouldnt have given it L23 and kept with an improved L15a5 and prototype HEAT-FS and PISH rounds to go with the tank.
Its weird how L23 was always a “we will add it IF the tank needs it” outside of this case lol.
thats genuinely ridiculous af on its on regard.
that L15A5 round being identical to the L15A3 from 1966 is ridiculous as well isnt it.
Inclined to agree here.
The L23A1 round entered service in 1983 same as the challanger 1 entered service, believe it was either 2 moths prior or after CR1 (could be wrong)
However the Shir 2 theoritically can fire L23A1 due to it being the same gun but as you say, it was dropped in 1979?
Why they dont implement L15A5 properly give it penetration similar to what it should have, seeing as IRL it could apparently go through the UFP of a T64A equivelant target.
This with the Iranian ammo could make a massive difference.
At this stage id rather it get L23A1 and go to 10.0 at least then itll be in a nice lineup, not seeing 10.7s with only L23 round which does struggle with them.
Or if its only AP round was the 15A5 then it could potentially sit at 9.3 IF they made the L15A5 round what it should be.
This honestly was my hope on the tank originally, 9.3 to lineup there and be a low tier composite armour tank for the UK. Would have been unique and actually played a lot, as it is I can see once the fad rolls over the tank becoming niche and rarely used.
I mean compare it to other 9.7s
T64B better armour due to era and profile, round 3bm42 optics and reload.once shir 2 is past the first stage.
Amx40 is just better overall and has a dm13 equivalent
Every other 9.7 mbt either is far more mobile, thermals, and better round or 2 out of those 3
Come on Guys lets see whos going to be getting it and who’s not!
Im gonna get it, but id also like to see the thing fixed and given proper ammunition and the ammunition such as L15A5 to be fixed.
I’m going to be honest, i don’t think it will be fixed / improved.
sorry id rather tell it to you straight
but its another vehcile i can say i have collected (even though it might not be in the right state i get it just incase it get improved in the future)