No.
1 Like
Why in big 2026 i still can’t grind event plane in a event as in “Nuclear Thunder”…
I kind of would rather do a one big ‘sesh’ rather than 5 small
1 Like
I just hope server will be better, right now its almost unplayable…I really wanna grind for this plane
why no 9m
bc its already OP enough at 13.0
They could put it at 12.0 and people would still find a way to call it overtiered
only 4 AMRAAMs at 12.0?
a clear sign of gaijin artifically nerfing the F-16XL
Honestly, should also get 9Ms and BOL and maybe 9X for good measure just in case the 9Ms aren’t enough
Is Nuclear Escalation not counting towards event progress?
yes
Any reason why?
different score calculations
any1 find it odd f-16xl is categorized as a fighter in wt when it should be a strike aircraft? built to compete against the f-15e. so should be listed as a strike aircraft too.
Ok so the event is supposedly (unless postponed?). It’s not displayed in the upper right corner so I can’t follow the progression. I only see “military survival kit” where it’s supposed to appear when it’s cycling through the events. Did the GUI somehow change? Is there an alternate route to see my progression?
EDIT: I found the alternate route but for me the events are not cycling like they used to be in the upper right corner.
ah i know what u mean only thing listed there is the survival kit. good u found another way to see it. dont need to help out then.
Bruh, my shit would brick itself the day the event goes live
Am I crazy or did Gaijin quietly push a decrease to mission score reward from base bombing?
…so like the Mirage 5’s, Milan, MiG-27’s, Kfir’s, Hunter Mk.58, P-16,… not to even mention all the multi role aircraft like F-16, F/A-18,…
Vehicle classification in WT is very arbitrary, and in a lot of cases causes confusion and even frustration, because of wrong expectations.
Tbh most of those should be classified as strike aircraft, anyway above rank 5 it doesn’t affect anything, and it would be more accurate
At least the Viggens are distinct in their classification. The same should at least apply to the F-16 vs F-16XL.