Recent data mine shows it’s going at 13.0.
1 Like
I don’t think we can trust discord server leaks they said isreal would get an impossible f15IA
That’s from a made-up leaklist from nobody.
2 Likes
oh then maybe 13.0 that would be perfection gajin (I’m still waiting for f15EX devblog snail ) since this is an event vehicle it is unrelated to the upcoming update devblogs
Well, well, well…
what does this mean?..
1 Like
Farm points :)
nice I’ve got 6k GE from packs if needed but I don’t want to use it but I might have to if needed idk if I can play that much I’ma do it with su30MKK or f18c early the MKK is probably the better option tho
Sure, MKK is better option actually.
or I could do something stupid and bring like 12? fire bombs with 0 missiles and steal all the bases in the hornet for massive game points
Maybe, IDK…
I’m going to take it easy with those two vehicles I showed in the screenshot without getting frustrated. Maybe I could even use the FR-1 Fireball in Simulator Battles and finish each star even faster.
The Wyvern would make more sense, but I’ll stick to Rank I with event vehicles so I don’t have to deal with the stress.
I don’t have a low teir event vehicle:( and I’m pretty bad and props I think I could get it easier with su30MKK BVR in pl12s that would be lazy but as long as I get the f16XL a f14 would be nice for this method too
peak
U have the F-14D premium ?
nah not anymore I returned it I miss the aim9Ms but not really much else I was getting cooked every game that could be called a skill issue but idk
I’ll try to get it … but i don’t think i have the patience or the time to play ARB.
It’s ok though, at least it’s a unique vehicle.
I do also have a few 10.0 and 8.7-9.0 and b-52 if I don’t want to use Su30MKK or premium F18
Will there ever be another crafting event again rather than just meeting a point count every few days?
Okay, sure, the lack of Mk82 can consider the AFMC’s legend invalid, but it does not prove that the Test Stores are what was planned for the plane.
X being incorrect does not make Y correct.
In both the AFMC book and Elegnace in Flight, AMRAAMs are only ever mentioned as being planned to be sat in the semi-recessed pylons.
Per the engineers: The entire point of the Semi-recesed pylons was to allow the XL to carry as many A2G munitions as possible while still having missiles to defend itself.
Where did you find that a MRML rack was tested for the XL?
I can see where you can get the idea that it was planned, but it was certainly not tested. And we don’t have any proof of the XL actually carrying more than x4 AMRAAMs, (no, Gaijin will not accept wind tunnel testing)
In reality, the XL never flew with more than x4 Mockup AMRAAMS.
We know this since we literally have every flight test log.
In this book, between pages 309 and 372.
What does the 141 have to do with this?
1 Like
They were not. the XL only ever flew with mockups.