Im more curious as to whether who will get the Lav III’s. Brit mains seem pretty intent on the Muh commonwealth when someone mentions a vehicle but idk both brit and US could benefit from the wheeled tonks.
Nice! Super excited to grind this one out!
Gives me an excuse to grind out some tech trees too ;-)
1 Like
I feel sorry for the people getting exited over modern and to add on-top of that copy paste vehicles. Most of all I am dissapointed with Gaijin that they keep adding this trash and neglecting older eras
1 Like
the muh commonwealth isnt an argument here when LAV-III’s have more chances of going to the US TT than as commonwealth addition
And yet the brits still got the F111C because they wanted one. Aside from the common wealth they have no ties to it. Its a good addition but it still doesnt make sense if we follow gaijins rules.
send me the second slide i wanna see
1 Like
also regarding mobility Boxer should be a lot better in terms of manouverability and offroad capacity just look at this
8 Likes
Another reason it shouldn’t be below 10.0
oh damn you made the suggestion LOL
yeah rather funny lol
1 Like
yeah unfortunately its mobility is not coded correctly
2 Likes
btw if anyone wondering sights are paseo 3RD gen thermals altough fixed on 8x
I was actually just going to right a suggestion for this. Now i dont :D
lol worse of all is that monopolized the history of the boxer and it cant be copied, apparently its some copyright thing
All three Belgian Cockerill turrets have been trialed fully on the Belgian owned piranha III chassis, with also the more well known Belgian Leopard 1A5BE 3105 as the typical example of a MBT configuration.
So no vehicle is lost yet ;)
Belgian variants can also additionally get a far more powerful round than dm63.
Some of the Belgian ammunitions made by MECAR which can be used by the 3105
Some on the Belgian ammunitions made by MECAR which can be used by the 3105
| Designation | Gun | Caliber | Type | Velocity | Weight | Penetration | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M393A2 | NATO 105 mm | 105 mm | HESH | 732 m/s | 11,2 kg | 127 mm | In-game |
| M1060(A1) | NATO 105 mm | 105 mm | APFSDS | 1510 m/s | 5,8 kg | 400 mm at 60° at 2000 m | Equivalent to the M833 round (395 mm in game) |
| M1060A2 | NATO 105 mm | 105 mm | APFSDS | 1460 m/s | 6,2 kg | 440 mm at 60° at 2000 m | |
| M1060A3 | NATO 105 mm | 105 mm | APFSDS | 1560 m/s | 6,2 kg | >500 mm at 60° at 2000 m | |
| M1060CV | Cockerill 105HP | 105 mm | APFSDS | 1620 m/s | 6,2 kg | 560 mm at 60° at 2000 m | Superior to M900 (522 mm in game), matching NATO 120 mm |
| M1061 | NATO 105 mm | 105 mm | HEAT | 1173 m/s | 10,5 kg | 400 mm | Modernized M456A2 |
| Falarick 105 | Cockerill 105HP | 105 mm | GLATGM | 370 m/s | 24 kg | 550 mm behind ERA | In-game |
Much thanks to @mr_boo for his Belgian ammunition spreadsheet!
This boxer variant was only ever even considered by the Dutch government, so it could be added to either Belgium or Germany, but either claims are weak either way. This solution suits me quite well, hopefully we’ll see the other ones in other updates.
1 Like
speaking of wich, i cant believe there is more info on the round for the cockerill 3105 than DM63 and i hate it cuz we know the lenght its incorrect ingame but we haven o way of proving it
1 Like
It was a replacement, they added it because the british f111k wasnt possible.
Still that kinda breaks rules set by gaijin, though uts not like they follow them anyways
Which rule did it broke?