This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
2 Likes
Everyone has a duty to put an end to this kind of thing, and I don’t want the kind of discrimination German vehicles face now to happen to vehicles in other countries.
3 Likes
yes he has been spaming this everywhere
2 Likes
So you think L2A8 should get treated this unfairly?
The treatment of ABRAMS, without objective data means there’s no change and good luck finding data for a 2020 tank
What about the model and the judgment box?
In general, if you want better armour, you need to find documents that specify improvements in numerical values or percentages, etc., etc., etc.
No I think spamming the forum is the best way of getting an unvoluntary break from it
1 Like
But in reality, this armor has equivalent strength. Even if it’s made of high-hardness metal, it would still be in the range of 10-30 ke. Does that count as a game inaccuracy?
If you’ve got any document that clearly states it’s the same but it’s different in the game, it’s worth filing a report,otherwise, just forget about it or wait is dev server
So you think it’s only natural that there are issues with vehicle data and judgment models being incorrect, and that other countries besides Germany should be treated differently in the same way？
Can you read? I think you should stick to the already created forum threads for the Leo 2A8 instead of creating at least 3 new threads in the span of 5 hours about the same topic
1 Like
He is only saying that you should stop spamming threads
I won’t be making any more posts about A8; I’m just shocked by the official NAB’s massive amount of normal and valid evidence reports.
If you look at the history of the M1A2 buff…