the worst efts
austrians dont use fox3 missles for whatever reason apparantly
1 Like
Yea I can understand that.
This is a genuine issue for me as well, it’s why coalition trees or foldered trees are the solution (even if Smim snuffed out option a). It’s that or we get more Israel like trees (which still have plenty of domestic options but gajin has some vehement refusal to add).
Just fly in a way that minimises damage /j
1 Like
unless the player is so good the sky starts speaking latin when he flies the austrian EFT, i dont believe it would work.
1 Like
issue is, how would get coalition with who gets decided. again, wargame handles this pretty well, but thats fundamentally different game with fundamentally different needs for playability (and fundamentally different time traveling stuff. saying hi to padobranci 90, a 1990 unit, fielding a 2005 ATGM because reasons) and fundamentally different balancing issues.
1 Like
There is quite a few MOWAG vehicles they could add to the ground portion that i wouldn’t mind seeing.
Im not tho am I?
As far as I’m concerned the UK tree should be CANZUK and SA, I’m not going to claim everyone because at some point in time we owned them or a part of them lmao.
to save the questioning here’s my thoughts on where countries should actually be
Germany just germany and Argentina as they don’t need any assistance from other countries.
USSR for USSR nations (would prefer china to have been there for less C&P)
America USA and the rest of south America that isn’t Argentina.
France should have Switzerland as they could do with the random vehicles from a country that hasn’t got enough to be its own tree more than Germany could ever.
BeNeLuX could have been its own tree its a tragedy, id put spain and Portugal with them too
Italy has hungary, id also have greece with them so its a medeterrainian tree
japan should keep Thailand.
Swedens doing just right with Scandinavia
Israel gets India due to collaborations in the past, makes sense to have countries that came into existence around the same together to be together too
1 Like
It’d have to be by either region (which has some obvious exceptions) or relations (wether diplomatic or via military projects)
Also thought you said wargaming as in the company and got a vivid memory of the “pan europe” coalition in wows, combining Poland, Norway, Sweden, Greece, Turkey, Austria-Hungary and Yugoslavia (also used to have the Netherlands).
That ship sailed long ago for that to not be a bad idea to change to that
1 Like
which is basically how wargame handles it. it even allows you to minmax decks (your armies simply put) with every NATO or PACT country, but you get some limitations on size of your army and access to prototype units (usually the best of the best stuff. NATO deck can have most of the stuff up until 1985, but cant take the most advanced abrams tanks for example).
this wouldnt obviously work in warthunder as there are no prototype units (well there are but prototype is loose term in relation to what i am saying. EFT is considered prototype unit for UK, so is chally 2).
so introducing this kind of lineup building for WT would most likely end up with players minmaxing their lineups and taking only the best options, which would be terrible for any balancing, and make off-meta vehicles even more off meta.
1 Like
Unironically, I wish multi national lines ups were a mode, let me switch between my Challenger DS and Su-25BM.
well its obvious by the vehicles your service record that your main is UK.
if you however mean that you personally dont claim everything under the sun, im fine with that argument, but lot of UK mains do.
So either we both generalise the nation mains, or we dont. No in between.
there are certainly some questionable choices but its just opinion at the end of the day.
what coalition that would even be lmao.
anyway i simply dont believe they would work due to aforementioned meta-slaving and balance issues.
1 Like
The coalition of my dreams, it would also include:
M109G
He 177 A3
Ayit
Mgb 75
HMS Jervis
Mirage 2000C-s4
yes but I play a good bit of USSR and occasionally sealclub using 6.7 germany now too. tiger 2 is probably a little low in BR.
most the British mains on this forum don’t, most of us are in a discord server together so I know they arent.
not as questionable than gaijins own
1 Like
as much as i think it would be funni to bring lineup with pantsir, Su-34, type 10, 2A7V and both Strv122A/B, i dont think it would be balanced.
1 Like
yea i dont speak for him nor do the more common to see brit mains. however as India has been a subtree for a while now and we still don’t actually have a single good vehicle from that country it would be a welcome change from the same old underwhelming C&P or DOA slop
entirely fine by me. I have exactly zero issues with that.
BUT
you cant have it both ways, ie. britain getting the good stuff from india subtree while at the same time denying swiss vehicles from swiss subtree to germany.