It was just a test base without turret or any armament
The excellent written story about this project can be read here
6 Likes
As far as i know turret was removed after first test, so…
Is there any chance of the Chu-SAM Kai getting added? The current one is painful to use
Chu-SAM Kai will be pretty same
Same overload as Chu-SAM, no TVC, so it will do same climb shooting
Maybe a little faster and higher range (but more range is not what needed)
2 Likes
Wait i thought the Kai had TVC?
It doesn’t
There isn’t any mention of TVC in docs or other stuff
1 Like
then gaijin should allow multi-vehicle sams to spawn at or around the helipad nearest to the battlefield
I meant this, right side from the turret, not right in the picture.
Under that is the staggered ATGM launcher
5 Likes
AS I SAY AGAIN
Indonesia not even order an ATGM form ukrain
Ref form BTR-4 Information Panel | in Naval Expo 2022 ( Indonesian)
- BM-7 Parus RCWS Combat Module
- 30mm ZTM-1 (2A72) Autocannon
- 400x Rounds (Standard Ammunition selection)
- 7.62mm PKT Machine Gun
- 2000x Rounds
- 30mm AGS-17 Grenade Launcher
- 87x Rounds
- without Barrier ATGM
** Indonesia not even order an ATGM form ukrain **
And suggestion for BTR-4 Indonesia that pass to the gaijin DEV
there have an mention that no ATGM were instal on stysem
mean the Barrier Missile is presumably not in use by the Marine Corps since there was no report or evidence of it being acquired or used by the Indonesian Marines
We also have AH-64E that have no proof of using any ATGM at this point or even LDIRCM. Yet here we are.
5 Likes
I’m not saying Indonesia used them, but they could use them without needing to modify their BTR-4s. The launchers are there, just not the missiles.
I think if we get them or not is mainly going to be based on if Gaijin want it to fill a lower or higher BR, because the capability is there and now the final decision is up to them.
7 Likes
Guess what, thai Alpha Jets didn’t have the gunpod ir but we have it in game. If the ability is there then it doesnt matter that the specific nation doesnt use it. So we very well may see ATGM on Indo BTR-4
3 Likes
That’s because in this game Gaijin isn’t restricted to weapons that were used by nations on vehicles, or in many cases even weapons that they owned at all, but instead they go by vehicle capability. The Malaysian F/A-18D can use AGM-88A, the Indonesian Hawk 209 can use Sea Eagle. Adding weapons is really on limited by what a vehicle could use if you put it on, and decided by which of these Gaijin want in game.
I won’t say I agree with this all the time, but it’s how this game works, and more importantly how it works for every single vehicle. For example the Swedish/South African/Hungarian Gripen C gets AGM-65G which were something used only by Thailand, but are added anyways because they are technically compatible without modification and they wanted them on all Gripen Cs.
There is genuine fake weapons though, like the Thai F-16A OCU getting AMRAAM that it couldn’t use until (E)MLU modernization the in-game variant doesn’t have. Things like that shouldn’t exist even by Gaijin standards and can be bug reported, they are just slow at fixing these.
4 Likes
Everyone else in the community is trying to get Kaijin to make the in-game data more realistic, but he wants to fakeing it it? That’s hilarious.
Just go to report and problem ot any that u see dosent irl infor and stop fakeing information
start with BTR-4 indo first they dosent order ATMG Do you agree with this ?
Personally I’d rather have it without them, as it’s used by Indonesia. I’m just saying that because it can use them Gaijin can make the final decision based on what BR they want it more than anything else.
2 Likes
You’re oversimplifying. There’s a difference between a completely fictional loadout and a historically documented, technically integrated configuration that just wasn’t adopted by one operator.
A configuration isn’t automatically “fake” just because it wasn’t fielded by a specific country. If it was technically integrated / fully compatible with the platform, it’s a plausible historical configuration - not the same as inventing something that could never exist.
9 Likes
I would unironically bring the type 10 TD to 12.7 if it had actual armor
1 Like
The bottom one is perfect for the Police the Tank Police…
2 Likes