General Japanese, Thai & Indonesian Ground Forces Discussion HQ

well to give another example Singapore is almost confirmed to China, and what did the singaporean players do? They said they dont want to be grouped up with China, so Gaijin changed the plans so that now Singapore isnt going to with China

now imagine we replace Singapore with South Korea & China with Japan,

They dont change it for “political reasons”, but if there’s a lot of outcry they will change it. T-90 to UK for instance, there were some opponents to the idea, but its not a whole lot of noise so they went ahead with it. Iranian Tomcat, has the Iranian Islamic Republic modifications (a nation which is hostile and had been fighting the US) was given to the US. Some opponents there, but again, nothing major, so it goes. Recent examples, Greek to Israel, again some voiced concerns but not a whole lot so no progress there.

But from what I’ve seen, on the South Korean suggestions there seems to be a lot of negative voices to the Idea (alot more than the examples ive mentioned before), so I dont think it will proceed even if it is being considered.

And besides lets think of it from Gaijin’s perspective, you have two choice for additional subtree, why wouldn’t they look after the less-controversial Southeast Asian nations rather than a would-be controversial South Korea? Even if they’re objective, why risk that chance? you have a perfectly good option right here, without the added (possible) controversy that would be caused by choosing the alternative

3 Likes

I’ll see if theres a Sipri entry, they prefer those

I’ve already looked, it seems like they’re grouped together as “Starstreak” so no hope there

Indonesia could help plug it up with the many IFVs it had/has. The Indo Leopard 2A4 / 2RI could definitely help that gap, possibly the Harimau Hitam.
`+ Malaysian T-84 (Object 478DU8, Prototype T-84).

3 Likes

AIM-120? Maybe a Sparrow? Its decommissioned

1 Like

i mean. people don’t want a two f16s in the same line right?
but i’m ok if gaijin add eMLU to the line. we need it anyway.

1 Like

Huh

That’s why I got confused

someone removed it… last month?

(Link to the edit)

Edited them back in with the new source
That’s my first Wikipedia edit

2 Likes

With OCU as it is now it would be redundant to have both and better to change it to (e)MLU, but the real OCU would be very interesting because it would have a much different role at a lower BR.

If the OCU was 12.7 with out AMRAAM (like Belgian OCU) it could even replace the F-16AJ.

Speak for yourself, more the merrier!

Also it doesn’t need to be in the same line, it could easily replace the F-16AJ or be foldered with it. Since it’d be great CAS, it’d follow the AV-8S + A-7E CAS capabilities.
image

Ahem, bit of a self-plug but if any of you would like to see the expanded list of vehicles you can see it here:

Yeah it depends, some articles has someone really strict that would just veto any changes or sometimes they’re just very chill

3 Likes

I wish someone made a suggestion post for the Ka-To Tank Destroyer

Before anyone says “But it wasn’t built!!!1!1!!” I don’t really care, id take a unique vehicle design realized in WT that would fit perfectly in a spot where Japan’s Ground Tech Tree needs something desperately over more copy paste in general.
image

13 Likes

I made a report on the Chi-Ri’s 37 mm hull gun lacking a shoulder stabilizer.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/OpOXrcXMVlQk

3 Likes

yay the Chi-ri can enter the halls of gaijin nerfing another japanese tank into the death zone. just that unlike those in the past, i dont think the chi-ri can survive 5.7 whatsoever.

2 Likes

The changes to the autoloader look promising.


Not only 1 but 2 Harriers equipping the AIM-120C
How do they use them??

https://x.com/polietzz/status/1985348602781462870

Ho-Ro at the exhibition

Spoiler




3 Likes

The don’t, there’s not even a rail there lmao
it’s just a display thing if I had to guess

2 Likes

They don’t. These are decommissioned (T)AV-8S’. Likely there just because it looks funny. None of these aircraft have a radar or are capable of using the AIM-120.

2 Likes

It’s wonderful.
IMG_2049
IMG_2054
IMG_2050
https://x.com/military_hobbys/status/1985673476469064117?s=46

9 Likes

https://x.com/military_hobbys/status/1985672301594178007?s=46

1 Like