General Japanese, Thai & Indonesian Ground Forces Discussion HQ

[30x170_APDS-T]

If you want to complete the list, here’s a couple more links (about zero’s going 6.0, and a part of the 12.0 lineup)

Type 81 (C) and Tan-SAM Kai
11.7-> 11.0 and 12.0 → 11.3

TKX(P)
12.0 → 11.7

A6M5 Ko and Otsu
stay at 5.7 (217 likes as for now, impressive)
Second link

A7M1 (NK9H)
7.7->5.3

R2Y2
8.0 → 7.3 for air realistic
V1
V2
V3
Could have been easier to just say R2Y2 (V1, V2, V3) or R2Y2 (all variants) honestly

IJN Isuzu
4.7 → 4.3

F-16A OCU (JPN)
13.7 → 13.3

Bonus:
Ho-Ri Production
7.3-> 12.7

[MAUSWAFFE]

@30x170_APDS-T

F-16A OCU (JPN)
13.7 → 13.3

Or they could just fix it and move it to 12.7 like the Belgian F-16s with similar armament. There is absolutely no reason for it to get AMRAAM when there is other AMRAAM capable F-16s that could’ve been added instead.

[30x170_APDS-T]

hehehe

[skultew1234]

@30x170_APDS-T

A7M1 (NK9H)
7.7->5.3

Dude is from future

[PercussionCap]

@30x170_APDS-T

Could have been easier to just say R2Y2 (V1, V2, V3) or R2Y2 (all variants) honestly

You have to make one post per vehicle even if they’re very similar like each R2Y2 model.

[Noveos_Republic]

I made something long for the A6M5 Otsu

Planned Battle Rating Changes (August 2026)

Proposal for Reducing Battle Rating: A6M5 Otsu [image] BR: 6.0 → 5.3 I’m honestly beyond frustrated that I even have to make a comment for this, let alone the several I have do for each A6M, that I know will be ignored in the end. Still, that tiny sliver of hope you developers will listen is making me write this out. But seriously Gaijin, what are we doing?? This used to be at 4.7! Rationale: Let’s start on the playerside to get this out of the way. Most of the playerbase agrees that the A6…

[Noveos_Republic]

They also need to fix the F-16AJ

[Noveos_Republic]

veeeeeeerrryyy funny ò_ô

[mirioka]

Or just replace it with real one from Thailand or Indonesia su27

[NhifanHafizh]

Better yet, make it a pre-upgrade Indonesian F-16A blk15, or make it F-16C blk52ID

[Филин]

It seems to me that the rocket flies straight from the guide, without falling on the trajectory, as it happens in the game

Spoiler

- YouTube

[Xermaz]

Most likely because of the ATGM dip they did. It supposed to only affect 2 stage missile like TOW( I don’t even think that TOW should have even dipped that low) but we’re talking about gaijin here.

[Филин]

Can someone file a bug report? I’m extremely unsure of my ability to write one correctly.

[onemax9000]

@アスタロス

¡THIS IMAGE Generated entirely by AI!

Got some of my own
(¡These are AI Generated Images!)

¡These are AI Generated Images!

[onemax9000]

Hoping the first one has a functioning gun with a decorative barrel. Would make a good event vehicle.

[onemax9000]

@Purrserker

I found these two fan made trees on reddi

2nd one is made by Wiggly_Armed_Man

[30x170_APDS-T]

No, maybe the first ATGM did that, but it is countered by the flying system of the TOW.
Here is a video, but I can’t put it ditectly in the forum bc it’s from Ukraine.

[PercussionCap]

What plane is that on the second image?

[JPAU401]

It’s a G3M

[CharAznable3]

I’m fine with this use of AI as long as its labeled to prevent trolling or any confusion so it can be used to demonstrate the possibilities of what it could look like in game.