Komatsu Lav would be cool to have in 9.7
9.7-10.7 depending on armament reason for the higher br bracket for it, look at the ussr/germany/us/sweden mains when someone other than them gets something good/fun
Iβd rather have a Type 11 ARH than a Type 81C ARH because Type 11 has a mode that can handle hovering.
why not both :D
Not sure what BR it will at but I know we finally get our missile rat tank when it added
oh boy another up brβd spaa that lacks any radarβ¦ grand
given they are doing multi vehicle SPAAβs we could get a radar trailer maybe, at the cost of max speed or no radar but more max speed
No thanks.
I now have every single japanese tech tree ground vehicle. Now we waitβ¦
105GSR when?
MMPM
For 105GSR here almost no enough information about how it worked to be honest. The only thing what we really know is mobility part
MMPM, but also CCV π
Honestly I want the 105GSR more just because it looks cool. MMPM would probably be a little too high BR to still be enjoyable for me.
Yeah but CCV is another thing with some blind parts what we donβt know about but here is much more information than 105GSR of course
The best part of MMPM is that it is T O Y O T A!
T-2 CCV
Currently we have a userskin/market place camo for the T-2 ingame. However we do not have the CCV itself
Depends on if Gaijin actually introduces the MMPM with its LOAL capability. But I doubt they will, so it will essentially act like current Spikes but faster.
(Bomb switch from the F-104Jβs Cockpit - JASDF Hamamatsu Air Park)
Also where is F-104Jβs bomb kit? From what I am aware it has the same bomb kit as the F-104G + Flares
Thatβs because the CCV was converted from one of the unarmed T-2.
The F-104G was sold as a fighter-bomber and used as such, while the F-104J was exclusively used as an interceptor by Japan. It has only ever been seen equipped with rockets rather than bombs. The only ordnance it is missing is the AAM-1 missile.
I was talking about the Close Combat Vehicle (CCV), not the T-2 Demonstrator (which is off-topic btw).
mb