“whole years”
That’s how starved we are lol
Is the data of the radar vehicle right, it only has 20 degrees of scanning the sky.
no, the radar is very incomplete.
It is the dev
yeah in training ground it probably fine, but in matchmaking? beside spawn point that rarely have cover? putting them not close together is nigh impossible. putting one launcher at a time is probably the most realistic here, and not on the radar vehicle when it’s the most important is kinda foolish.
i just wish you can carry 2 separate launcher with each only ARH or IR, because right now if one of your launcher have ARH and the other have IR loaded, it will be impossible to get a lock and launch
The TAN-SAM-KAI is the type11 or just another type 81C?
1 Like
Type 11 is Tan-Sam Kai II
the one we are getting is Type 81C with ARH and IR
1 Like
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
Do you have these documents to share? They would be very interesting to read.
AAM-4B maybe, but I feel like AAM-5 should be added alongside similar missiles like IRIS-T, so far there is no air launched equivalents in game.
2 Likes
Shouldn’t the IR missile of the Type 81 be called something else? As far as I could find, the SAM-1C reffers only to the ARH variant, not the IR one.
Both are called SAM-1C.
6 Likes
Not confusing at all.
Then again, we are talking about military that has a tank called Type 10, that has a gun called Type 10, that fires a shell called Type 10.
4 Likes
“I love the Type 93” and you don’t know if he’s talking about the SAM system or the shell.
It could be the Anti-ship missile, or flamethrower… Or torpedo, armoured car, mine, hmg…
1 Like
I’ll sift through the ones that are able to sent. This’ll take some time. Unfortunately I have over 1,000 pages of them to go through.
I know I promised you guys a video on the type 10 and TKX guys
I unfortunately got injured
Unfortunately I had some things to sort out with my PC
I have to redownload warthunder all over again
I will be back up by tomorrow and I’m looking at either a Tuesday or Wednesday release
Key points that we are going to be going over
The armor
Model inaccuracies
Mobility inaccuracies
Honestly if the mods/devs keep doing this I’m never not going to be able to have a video
There’ll be content for each week of the month to do a video on
2 Likes
Next level: “I love Type 97.”
1 Like
Do we have any sources on the vertical coverage of the Type 81 radar system? We have to do something about it, since 20 degrees is absolutely dog. Obviously the radar would also be angled slightly upwards (at least 10 degrees from what I could find so far), but that would only help a little. I am fairly certain the radar has much more vertical coverage than what we get in the game (dev) right now.
2 Likes
The only source at all that talks about vertical scan coverage that I’ve found is a really sketchy Russian propaganda website and suspiciously lines up with the figures Gaijin is using… And of course they don’t list any sources naturally.
2 Likes
Looking at videos and pictures of the FCS vehicle, it seems that the tilt can be manually controlled, something we do not yet have in game and that would greatly help the system. Can’t give you the exact numbers, but JGSDF never tilts less than 10 degrees, the picture below seems to have the radar dish tilted even more than that.
I’d say gaijin shoud either give us ability to tilt the radar manually, or set it to a fairly confortable 15 degrees. That itself would already help quite a lot.
3 Likes
https://aobamil.sakura.ne.jp/Photo/81SAM/81SAM.html
You can use a translator to translate the entire page, but what matters is the pictures of the radar itself. It is once again clearly tilted.