Besides that, the Type 11 on Isuzu Type 73 is cooler IMO
9 Likes
IMO both look cooler, imagine just a Type 11 zooming down the map
1 Like
SLS Prototype for sweden had a radar…
Yeah, but it’s also a two-part vehicle with the launcher towed. So the same configuration as a theoretical JGSDF Type 11 FCS radar vehicle with the launcher on a towed flatbed trailer.
how far do the type 11 missiles go?
From what I could find; 15km
1 Like
thats kinda my guy…
Please don’t swear
Best we can get from Japan, unless we consider Type 03 with over 50km range. Then there is also VL MICA from Thailand, but I doubt thats coming soon.
Another option is the SPYDER-SR from Singapore, but thats about it in therms of mid-range SAMs even if we consider any of the ASEAN founders Nations.
1 Like
sorry friendo
1 Like
15k just… really doesnt feel like a step up needed tbh… nations like russia and china have 18 and 15 respectively and with china getting what looks to be a spaa with 18k missiles and a apds slinging chaingun … idk man that doesn’t really feel like an upgrade…
I don’t see why we can’t just give the 81c it’s ARH which have a similar perfomance while without the need of having to grind 400k more RP
1 Like
There is nothing from Japan nor Thailand that could fill the large gap between Type 93 and Type 81(C). Its best to keep as it is and move it back to 11.0.
Twitter artists understand Japans autoloaders better than Gaijin
https://x.com/BP7793123416677/status/1802761374193651716
Note how it’s not too flat to for the motors that are supposed to sit under the ammo…
…or too long to actually fit the tank…
…or physically can’t even cycle the ammo…
…or somehow has a separate ammo rack below the first that’s also physically unable to move instead of it being one revolving rack.
Real Autoloader (Type 90)
4 Likes
yeah good luck moving it back down, Type 81c being 0.3br below the Pantsir is a sick joke only enabled by absolute incompetence.
1 Like
14 Likes
What do u bet if the 81 gets arh missiles it gets moved to 12.0
Actually 13.0
