I’d rather have a Type 11 ARH than a Type 81C ARH because Type 11 has a mode that can handle hovering.
2 Likes
why not both :D
1 Like
Not sure what BR it will at but I know we finally get our missile rat tank when it added
1 Like
oh boy another up br’d spaa that lacks any radar… grand
given they are doing multi vehicle SPAA’s we could get a radar trailer maybe, at the cost of max speed or no radar but more max speed
No thanks.
I now have every single japanese tech tree ground vehicle. Now we wait…
105GSR when?
MMPM
For 105GSR here almost no enough information about how it worked to be honest. The only thing what we really know is mobility part
1 Like
MMPM, but also CCV 🙏
5 Likes
Honestly I want the 105GSR more just because it looks cool. MMPM would probably be a little too high BR to still be enjoyable for me.
Yeah but CCV is another thing with some blind parts what we don’t know about but here is much more information than 105GSR of course
The best part of MMPM is that it is T O Y O T A!
5 Likes
T-2 CCV
Currently we have a userskin/market place camo for the T-2 ingame. However we do not have the CCV itself
1 Like
Depends on if Gaijin actually introduces the MMPM with its LOAL capability. But I doubt they will, so it will essentially act like current Spikes but faster.
1 Like
(Bomb switch from the F-104J’s Cockpit - JASDF Hamamatsu Air Park)
Also where is F-104J’s bomb kit? From what I am aware it has the same bomb kit as the F-104G + Flares
2 Likes
That’s because the CCV was converted from one of the unarmed T-2.
The F-104G was sold as a fighter-bomber and used as such, while the F-104J was exclusively used as an interceptor by Japan. It has only ever been seen equipped with rockets rather than bombs. The only ordnance it is missing is the AAM-1 missile.
I was talking about the Close Combat Vehicle (CCV), not the T-2 Demonstrator (which is off-topic btw).
mb
Not without the turret of course. If we could find any evidence that both the T53 engine and turret were mounted at the same time period, we would essentially be dealing with an M4A3 with a higher power-to-weight ratio than a BT-7, which should at least result in better acceleration at the cost of a more exposed engine module.
underside canard goes crazy. if only it was able to be armed </3