General Japanese & Thai Ground Forces Discussion HQ

Also i wouldn’t be surprised that if US mains would prefer something like the M55 since that SPG is a little different in the sense that has a different calibre

Perhaps, but the M55 would be larger, slower, with a longer reload, and worse gun handling. And either way, I don’t think Gaijin would miss the opportunity for an easy copy paste job for a major nation anyways.

2 Likes

Vehicles like M44 should be one of the absolute last resources for when there is nothing Japan made left to add.

I’m a little upset if this is the only thing we get for ground forces for the last patch of the year.
Still can not understand why the Type 74 SPH, the last remaining post-war domestically mass-produced SPH is still not in the game yet. And Gaijin has been avoiding from making Japanese ww2 tanks since i believe the Ka-Chi which was added back in 2021. Beside it is not like Japan is lacking of SPG to add either we have the Ho-Ni I Proto., Ho-Ni II, Ho-To, Ho-Ru, Ka-To etc.

11 Likes

There’s also the Type 56 SY.
Supposedly there was also a Na-To tested with the 75/55mm Type Ge squeezebore gun, which could be foldered with the current Na-To at 3.3~3.7 if its existence is substantiated.

.

8 Likes

It has the same gun as the Ho-Ni we have, right? The major difference is the gun shield?

It has a rangefinder too

Type 1 Ho-Ni (Prototype)

10 Likes

Based. I really want it. They should’ve used more range finders

Right now I’m doing research for the Ho-Ri II, but perhaps someone here can do the Ka-To?

That would be so cool to have. I love these sort of tracked prime-mover tank destroyers.

image

5 Likes

Na-To with 75/55mm gun? Do you have anything about it?

3 Likes

Yeah that and what being said, range finder which is the major difference between prod. and proto. variants.
If added it would be the lowest rank vehicle equipped with a range finder.

Also unlike the production Ho-Ni, it had a Chi-Ha style commander periscope.

The original suggestion was approved in 2020.

7 Likes

And before someone says that there are too few photos so it is not possible to reproduce in term of the model, well:


Is there anything else for a skilled 3D artist would need to replicate a vehicle model other than a entire illustration of it from four angles ?

Regarding the ammunition layout, crew placement, vehicle characteristics and so on would be completely fine to copy from the already existing Ho-Ni I in the game.

8 Likes

Its an 8 year old reddit post from Mai so you know its 147% reliable fr fr. The gun is just a licensed version of the German Pak 41, so we have a decent idea of its performance.
https://www.reddit.com/r/Warthunder/comments/5ybezw/type_ge_75mm_anti_tank_gun_natochito/

5 Likes

And before someone says that there are too few photos so it is not possible to reproduce in term of the model, well:

Not to disagree with you, but I feel like people forget that we have the Chi-Ha LG, of which there is only 1 photo from the side lol.

We really need more ww2 stuff

1 Like

I can’t think of a more reliable source!

1 Like

There is a need for more WW2 stuff in general across all nations, even in the big three. There are some incredibly iconic, mass-produced, vehicles that are somehow absent (or at best, locked behind a paywall).

3 Likes

Maybe it sound strange, but i want more “jeeps” for JGSDF, like Mistubishi (I know there ATGMs like on Type 60 ATM) or Toyota with ATGMs. Also Toyota with Type 11.

3 Likes

JASDF and multi-vehicle system.

The only is needed is MMPM with 6 fire-and-forget + TVD and MM radar for target searching

5 Likes

Fire them in pitbull mode?

JASDF Type 11 can’t operate at all without FCS unit(s) - This capability is exlusive to the JGSDF as they were specifically asking for it.

2 Likes

image
:o

1 Like