Seeing how a lot of aircraft went down in BR in GRB recently do you guys think it will be a good time to ask for the T-2 and F-1 to go down a little? While Japan already has 9.3 and 9.7 CAS respectively I don’t see why they are still 9.7 and 10.0 in GRB when T-2 has no CCIP/CCRP and F-1 only has it for bombs you could argue the speed and the vulcan but they aren’t really the fastest aircraft anyway and the vulcan is pointless in grb when you have to get really close to use it without any guidance, F-1 can carry more ordnance but there’s already other aircraft at that br that can carry similar or even less but heavier ordnance while having access to a full ballistics computer and even chaff
2 Likes
+1
The Alpha Jets are ludicrously better than both the T-2 and F-1 as they have flares, CCIP for rockets and bombs and the later one gets all-aspects missiles, there’s no point in using T-2 and F-1 doesn’t even have a lineup.
Their BRs should be lowered as they’re pretty much only half-viable for CAP as their flight models won’t do any favors in GRB, maybe even give the F-1 a countermeasure pod. The lack of CM make it so all you can effectivelly do is fly around the map to avoid the missile AAs and spawn camp their air spawn. Sure you can take rocket pods for makeshift flares but they work only when heading towards the missile and it kills the already bad maneuverability.
Guys I just did a suggestion about the ASM-3, do you know how much time is it pending before being verified and released ?
1 Like
Usually will take around 2-3 months to go through
1 Like
Still don’t know what the point adding ASM to the game, Gaijin is to stingy to gave point and reward for destroying vessel
2 Likes
honeslty it’s first because I think the missile is physically and arguably beautiful and since most of the future OP’s missiles are already considered…
And as well I want Gaijin to take another look at anti-ship missiles because they are fucked up; another relase would be benefic, they are forced to repair thoses
(excuse for the english, I am currently drunk)
1 Like
Another marathon - another copy non japanese plane
Oh, huh, the AAM-5 has BTT? I mean like, I’m not surprised, but it’s nice to have as a confirmation, if gaijin would ever actually implement BTT.
5 Likes
What would it change ? Better turn radius and better energy retention?
Yeah it’d make it turn better, and help with energy retention a bit but not much.
1 Like
With USA getting aim120D, Japan should have gotten the AAM4B alongside. The AAM4B will have less range but better tracking. We already have aesa radars in the game so i don’t think it would game breaking.
We already have it, depending on how you look at it.
The current AAM-4 doesn’t have the right textures, instead it uses AAM-4B textures
AAM-4B AESA seeker on the current in-game missile
Now of course textures don’t make a missile, but in this case performance lines up too, at least as far as the game is concerned. AAM-4B aside from the seeker is equal to the AAM-4, while the AESA seeker is a feature missing from all ESA missiles currently like the Type 81C ARH missile or the Type 03 missile, so as far as the current implementation goes we technically have AAM-4B.
3 Likes
Still missing mach 4.5 and again Gaijin is late on adding AESA seeker just like they added F2 late. They can’t think they fixed Japan top tier air by just adding a su30sm. If they’re fixing USA top tier, they need to fix japan top tier air too. If Micas got a better seeker for having a shorter nerfed range, I don’t see a problem with AAM4 getting a better seeker too. And japan only gets 4 aam4B so what’s so game breaking about that too? Gaijin should just add the B alongside the aim120d or right after.
Japan top tier is absolutely fine with the su-30 copy paste though.
“Japan” top tier air, its 13.7 right now
1 Like
we are already very lucky that Gajin didn’t convert the hilarious AIM-120 pull nerf to the AAM-4
isn’t this because AAM-4 somehow not a copy/paste from AIM-120, it was Derby somehow(as far as i remember at Dev server)
Looks like Japan will have to wait another year or two.
It was a mix between a mica and a sparrow on its initial dev, lol.
i guess so? probably, i forgot. all i remember is that AAM-4 somehow fly shorter and pull harder than AIM-120, which is pretty weird since it got similar body with AIM-7