this already got denied as a source.
1 Like
Yeah ik, I’m only using it as a reference. Have to use the actual sources, this is only good for a visual
Whelp, that works even better lol
Added a section in the OP for denied suggestions thus far, mainly pertaining to the HMD, x6ARH loadout, and AAM-4B
1 Like
An ‘ungimped’ AAM-4 would just be the current AAM-4 with the same range and less maneuverability. It already matches its range specifications, while exceeding it’s maneuvering performance.
An AAM-4B would have worse time to target in exchange for slightly greater range due to lofting, and a better seeker.
Is there any images of it armed in this full configuration? I’ve only seen just the 4x AAM-3’s and 4x AAM-4/AAM-4B’s.
There is no other “full” config. 4+4 is the maximum according to all reliable sources, everything else is speculation.
4 Likes
I’ve always seen that source floating around with the STA-3/9 sub-pylons with the “possible” △ x6~8 AAM4/B configuration, what exactly is that and where did that info come from?
Does the JASDF has some double MRM pylon sitting around or is that just some fantasy?
Nope.
v
1 Like
That’s fair, still all in favor of ASM-2B’s and GCS-1 Glided Bombs though
1 Like
Even so, that’s still 6x vice the 4x
no because you have to decide if you want sta 9 out or in you cant have both
2 Likes
Thats still from a Hobby Model kit, no actual source.
4 Likes
On that line, it says out or in for both sides (which is 1x per side) on top of the 4x existing AAM-4 mounts which means 6x. Either way though, it doesn’t apply since it’s fake sadly. ***If I understand it correctly lol, I’m a ground guy
1 Like