Agreed, at least in reddit, the contempt towards gaijin devs/moderators is growing. I’m looking forward to when their actions backfire
1 Like
Fix: slamraam range is not above 75km and the range is unknown but the peak speed which is known Is mach 4 and ingame its struggling to get to mach 3
Source: https://www.army-technology.com/projects/surface-launched/?cf-view
Ingame testing:
Source self testing and matawg testing:
1 Like
What about the bug reports for the Mig-29s underperforming, or the bug reports about the Mig-23s radar that were rejected despite being well sourced? You also didn’t bother to look because there are quite a few open ones.
Mig-23 IRST not providing range
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/KbZ5I6kII4qA
Mig-23 radar innacuracies (denied for being the same as a previous one despite being different, while also having proper sources
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/JYls1faLEq27
2 Likes
I didn’t said entirely non existing but i said there are way less bug reports than other nations
I highly doubt a review bomb will work because this stuff affects a small portion of the game when compared to the previous bombing. There are also much more important things to focus on than some poor SPAA implementation/CAS balance at top tier.
1 Like
As far as i know most sources posted in the SLM thread show 40km as EFFECTIVE range, ie against manuevering targets
1 Like
I also doubt review bomb will work But i hope at the very least that the developers will start actually to hear people like here an idea why not make Dev chat where the devs talk about the game and answer questions from the chat
IDK pretty much every missile I see stats on the web for only really list 1 range and its to make it look as good as possible. Effective range also can’t be a single number, effective range against what? Theres a big difference between shooting down a drone vs an f15 or su27 etc.
I want these systems to be better, I died to CAS almost more than I did tanks in my 12.0 russian lineup, and I don’t even have to face KH38 there so I can only imagine how much worse it is. 8.0-11.0 feels fine, but as soon as you go up any higher its ww2 BRs all over again, none of the SPAA in game can do much against a good CAS player. I’d love for these new systems to actually pose a threat.
1 Like
@xD Gaijin only listens to the forums.
As for the topic. AIM-120C range is listed for 12,000 meters altitude going mach 0.9.
Last I checked SLAMRAAM isn’t at 12,000 and it isn’t going mach 0.9.
AIM-120C-5 will be the most accurate range because there’s an air launched version they can put coding into and it’ll impact the ground launched one.
SLM does have issues, yes.
Pantsir being inferior to other SPAA is not Russian bias.
NATO vehicles are not nerfed into the ground… Mig-29’s thrust curve being horrifically wrong is not a NATO vehicle. Abrams turret ring is.
Mig-23s being heavily nerfed in flight models aren’t NATO vehicles.
F-5E still not having its flight model and engine heat corrected [nerfed] is a NATO vehicle.
Mig-21s having their flight models nerfed aren’t NATO vehicles.
Life does not revolve around NATO or Russia [which isn’t a tech tree BTW, USSR is].
There are criticisms to make.
Making up fictional things like nation bias does not help.
hey how do u draw that light line between 1st and 2nd setences?
Bro unfortunately you’re 100% correct Gaijin is super bias towards Russia and they make sure nothing from NATO outperforms anything Russian in the game lol Germany isnt included because in my 1000s of Top Tier games Russia and Germany are Inseparable always on the same team. And 2 of the most overperforming countries in the game lol Pantsir is still king even though IRL its terrible and useless 😂
Newsflash, Gaijin doesnt care. They decide what is the truth, if they want NATO vehicles to fall behind then thats what its gonna be.
I mean pantsir being added at 11.7 and stayed there for a long while just to be moved to 12.0 to be along side the up-coming top tier AA for other nation is funny to me, almost like it’s too powerful and should not have been added so early. Pantsir wasnt hit with a single nerf either.
And to rub it in US main face, ADATS was at the same BR as pantsir and was classified as “tank destroyer” for some reason so it cost more spawn points to use and it’s AA capability is dog water to say the least. If it wasnt for the almost-useful 800mm penetration it has on it’s missile, it would have been at ~10.7 right next to 2S6 since ADATS performance is nearly the same.
Oh and vehicles like BI, yak9k with APHE belt, and Object 279 exist. I cant think of any vehicle in other nation that is as broken as they are without being slap with a nerf. I notice that russian vehicle takes forever to get nerf, if they even do.
I can go on and on about the reek of russian bias but I would rather not
1 Like
iirc AIM-120C-5 would have around 20km effectiveness on ground launch, which isnt the case rn
the max range would be 25km and 20km effectiveness range
which if u know, it isnt reaching 15km
pantsir is superior to other nations spaa for like what? 3 yrs? so that is bias
as well as, armor, turret basket, hydraulic,
KH-38MT
1 Like
Yeah theres no idea to argue with AlvisWisla. He is only here to gaslight, thats what he does and been doing for years.
3 Likes
So M247 being superior to other SPAAGs is US bias.
china and russia got AA with proxy shell at 1.0 lower (8.0). Which is fair and all cuz they are open top and lacks radar, but m247 is at the right br.
1 Like
Three dashes after each other on a separate line with no text above or below.
So like
" — "
but without the quotes.
1 Like
You missed a lot
U-2 simulator
Ah, it was a good machine that carried out genocide, it’s just a pity after the nerf of shells and the increase in BR, it began to play randomly