Gaijin Give US the ‘Other’ Su-37

The History Time:

The ‘Other’ Su-37: The Ambitious Soviet Fighter Jet That Disappeared with the End of the USSR

In the turbulent early 1990s, as the Soviet Union neared collapse, the country’s aeronautical industry was still conceiving bold projects. Among them was a little-known project—often confused with the later super-maneuverable demonstrator—designated Su-37 (also referred to in some studies as S-37), conceived as a modular multi-role fighter capable of replacing a wide range of tactical aircraft.

The project emerged in the context of a profound Soviet doctrinal review at the end of the Cold War. The central idea was to create a single aircraft capable of assuming functions traditionally distributed among several models, including:
the Su-25 attack aircraft
tactical fighters such as the MiG-21 and MiG-23
export versions of the MiG-21

According to studies of the time, the aircraft would be a new generation multi-role aircraft, combining ground attack, limited air defense, and interdiction missions — something relatively uncommon in classic Soviet designs, which were historically more specialized.

The proposed aerodynamic configuration also attracted attention: a delta-canard combination with an “area-ruled” fuselage, aiming to reduce transonic drag and improve performance at high speeds.

Unusual engineering for Soviet standards
One of the most curious aspects of the concept was the concern with logistics and operation at existing bases. The project included folding wingtips, allowing the aircraft to occupy the same hangar space as variable-geometry fighters and even the compact MiG-21 — a rare solution in Soviet designs of the time.

Another advanced point was the emphasis on reducing the radar cross-section (RCS) and the extensive use of composite materials in the structure and skin. Although it was not a stealth aircraft in the modern sense, the approach indicated a shift in mindset in the Soviet industry, already sensitive to the low-observability trends gaining traction in the West.

Projected Performance (1992 Configuration)
Data released for the early 1990s reference configuration indicated a relatively light aircraft by Sukhoi standards:

Normal Takeoff Weight (NTOW): 18.35 t
Maximum Takeoff Weight (MTOW): 25.8 t
Internal Fuel: 5.8 t
Normal Payload: 1.96 t
Maximum Payload: 8.42 t
Maximum Speed: Mach 2.0
Range with Normal Payload: 2,400 km
Maximum Range: 3,750 km
Operational Ceiling: 16–17 km
These figures would place the design in an intermediate category between light fighters and dedicated attack aircraft, reinforcing the idea of ​​a “universal” replacement platform.

A Product of the End of the Cold War
The program reflected a broader trend observed in the late 1980s: the search for multi-role aircraft capable of reducing logistical costs and simplifying fleets. The Soviet leadership itself had ordered studies for a new multi-role fighter-bomber intended to replace several types in service with the Warsaw Pact.

However, the political and economic context changed rapidly. The dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991 triggered a deep financial crisis in the Russian defense industry, halting numerous promising aeronautical programs.

2 Likes

ts is so paper though

1 Like

Indeed, but that’s a video game, that’s what it’s for, to give life to what doesn’t exist.
Besides WT is more like an ace combat-style game than something historically accurate.

that’s Jas 39 but less diet is it fake?

3 Likes

Well then that’s that sadly. Dope as it is, it doesn’t fit gaijin’s stated criteria to be added to the game. Only way it would ever realistically be seen ingame to any extent is through a War Thunder Live user mission if a user ever makes it there.

It’s not exactly a perfectly historically accurate game (cough Yak-141), but it has its stated standards/criteria, which this sadly doesn’t meet.

3 Likes

They kinda already opened pandora’s box, so…
image

note:
I’m against paper vehicles, I’m just saying Gaijin is very inconsistent with their rules.

1 Like

They’ve gone over this quite a few times already on why they did it (stupid reasons ofc, but to some extent understandable), and they haven’t done it since nor expressed plans too. I don’t realistically see them doing it for a vehicle that outright didn’t exist when it provides nothing to the tree that can’t be gained by a vehicle that did exist.

It doesn’t fit their stated criteria (even if it didn’t for the F-16AJ, they bent the rules so Japan could at least have something and I really don’t expect them to do it again). They already have a thing against their own fake vehicle, such as the German ones which may never be obtainable ever again or removed by them. Heck I wouldn’t be surprised if they outright replace the F-16AJ with a Subtree F-16A of some kinda, but I have a feeling it will go into the side section one day, much like all the other paper vehicles before it.

Agreed

1 Like

looks like if a Su-35, a JAS 39, a F-16 and a J-10 had a child and this abomination had came to life.

Strangely, the R2Y2’s haven’t been moved to the gift vehicle section yet.

if we added other planes just based off design requirements (eg og su-27)…
shi would be better than the su-35.
I don’t think adding purely paper planes is a good idea