+1
27 Likes
+1 Very nice
+1 , britain (like a couple other nation’s) is long overdue for a high/top-tier anti-air , and adding a new african one would be nice since we didn’t get a african proper vehicle in like forever
1 Like
should be died 2022
He means my suggestion for ZA-HVM with new data that i did a few months ago. The only thing im missing is ZA-HVM picutre, as written sources game me all the data and proof of existence.
5 Likes
This absolutely should be added. Britain needs better/more reliable SAMs
+1 that Russian thread is crazy
Cause at CIS forum u make suggestion,
Firstly for community, to increase demand for this vehicle.
And the last for developers, to let them know that vehicle exist.
For example i even don’t care about filling of suggestion, cause:“If developers want more details they can just open .com suggestion”.
1 Like
TheEuropeanCanadian mentioned this vehicle i no longer support it being added to WT
8 Likes
D:
This is a full centence
3 Likes
It could never be more over than being mentioned by TEC by name, I’m sorry for your loss of street cred
5 Likes
Very good SAM, +1 to the vote. By the way, the method of guidance with IR missiles based on data received from the radar and the coordinates embedded in the missile’s memory at the time of launch is very good. The same guidance method is actually used by Tan-SAM (81) with IR (10 km) and active radar missiles at 14 km; Ozelot FIM92K and possibly Type 93. An extremely promising guidance method that allows for faster sequential shelling of several air targets.
If this method of targeting and firing is implemented correctly, it can bring some high-level and pre-high-level SAMs closer to the Pansir 1S - the ability to fire at 4 targets; and even surpass it - when the Pansir radar loses the target, it cannot guide the missile, and the G6-HVM Tan-Sam Ozelot will be able to guide and destroy a target that is even actively hiding behind a hill, provided that the missile’s homing head locks on the target and the missile has time to fly over the hill. This is especially true against annoying high-level helicopters.
I love this.
Huh it’s in here now too huh?
For the record, one of the people asking for the OSA-AK was Devil, the author of this suggestion lmao.
Oop everything disappeared, sorry mods ill come up with something different to say
4 Likes
the thread is now hidden because it was on the dev server, but here:
(ill stop now thatz, dw)
1 Like
Please stay on topic, and if you are wondering about the rules around classified documents please see here:
Any posting of any part of Classified document will result in your account being permanently banned. This is not the place to discuss the rules revolving around Classified documents. If you have questions about it feel free to reach out to a Community Manager in DM’s about it.
4 Likes
Guilty as charged ;)
But to be frank, as an SPAA main i want all of them.
4 Likes
More SPAA = less plen = more dopamine.
Thus more SPAA = more good
5 Likes
Exactly, that is why i would love to see more SPAA, just like the G6.
6 Likes
Sorry, I didn’t read carefully, I didn’t notice the moment with the initial DL. By initial DL does it mean laser/radio channel guidance or as in Tan-SAM the probable target coordinates received from the radar are sewn into the missile’s memory before launch? Because there are very few real short-range anti-aircraft missiles with wireless Datalink, there are probably even less than 5 models.
The missile flies on DL untill it is able to aquire the target itself. When it aquires the target with its own seekre, it terminates the DL. I band RF one. It is also capable of flying on intercept path IOG only.