They used it too
2 Likes
Btr is way worse than the fox in the bounce regard, it’s actually far closer to the XM800.
The btr also has some stupid bar that blocks are shooting to the rear of the vehicle below -1 degree of gun depression. The fox doesn’t, in fact, it has what? -15 ? -14? Degrees of gun depression?
But there is only a .4 br difference from the fox to the btr, which is insane to think. Especially because the xm800 preforms better at 8.0, thus the fox should since there’s more light tanks no? But then stabilizers would balance the fox problem, same with its pen being nerfed or others being buffed. (As was discussed already, either other auto cannons under preform or fox over preforms.
Very very rarely
It was optional for almost every round, mostly those from lend lease
1 Like
Where are these facts?
If you dig a bit you’ll find the RARDEN is underperforming
5 Likes
If you dig a bit, you’ll find the 2a72 under preforming
No as it doesnt jam nearly as much as it should
2 Likes
Unbelievably when you aim for the weakest parts you have a less than average result
and bc you penned them there i guess the T80U is worse than the scimitar in armour bc its been 12.7’d
lol it should be more like 94mm pen
According to russian sources?
Are you going to say they’re false now?
No, im going to say they measure penetration differently to nato where it requires less of the shell to exit than the nato standard of which this game is based on and the calculations are calculated at
this is a problem of compression, which is gaijins fault for only having ground battle ratings go up to 12.0
1 Like
All penetration values in War Thunder are calculated by gaijin using the same formula
Irl a lot of shells (NATO and Russian/Chinese) pen more than ingame
1 Like
Although I agree, the fox would still be perfectly fine at 8.0
Everything is measured by the same system for every nation in game… you can’t begin to say bias
Oh I know. Some more, some less.
That is nothing to do with what I said
1 Like