ZSU57-2 is 7.0))))))
57-2 br is lower)))
57-2 has more 40mm pen
57-2
Post pen damage is better than FV4005.
Russian Bias doesn’t exist)))))
Why it is 7.0?)))))))))
6 Likes
It very definitely shouldn’t be
You are literally just on this forum to argue with people using the most uninformed pov. How you’ve not been banned yet is beyond me. Every single time i see you post something it’s an argument with another community member stating something that’s factually incorrect.
Scorpion soon then?
We can hope hah. Hopefully HESH gets some tweaks before it gets added so it isn’t completely useless, though I doubt it.
4 Likes
1 Like
First off, at no point in that video does the Fox ever get shot in the side with .50 cals aside from at an angle. The Fox, when angled can and should easily defeat .50 cals.
The 105mm did not “fuse” because it was never actually fired, there is an ingame glitch where damaged guns when fired will produce a projectile even if they aren’t firing. This is just a visual bug, its not a Fox issue. if the shot was fired but did not fuse, it would still have done at least some damage, it didn’t. There is also no hit sound for the huge 105mm shell, as once again, it never actually registered.
So in these videos:
-
The Fox resists .50 cals which is intended.
-
The Fox takes a glancing shot and survives, which is expected.
-
The Fox player breaks the T29’s barrel before he shoots so his shot dosen’t actually count, just a visual bug.
None of these are Fox specific issues.
4 Likes
The video of the Fox vs BTR shows both the BTR AND the Fox’s guns bouncing around all over the place when you go over a bump.
The Fox has excellent gun elevation speed (compared to the BTR), therefore it can correct its gun faster, hence why the “bouncing” is less noticeable. This is the case for any vehicle with better verticle targetting speed.
Fox vertical targetting speed: 30 degrees/s
BTR vertical targetting speed: 14 degrees/s
Its almost like vehicles with better gun handling have better gun handling?
2 Likes
The only thing wrong with the the Fox is the amount of drivel you have to grind to even get to it…So much crap you have to waste SL on.Not so with Russia.
Nobody should be forced to grind the Ratel 90 :)
2 Likes
it gets shat on but the Ratel 90 isn’t bad by any means, its perfectly serviceable even at 6.7, where I bring it out, just pray you don’t get a hilly map or a map covered in mud
1 Like
ZSU-57-2 has a comparable turret traverse, I think that’s about it, it’s not as stable, isn’t as fast, and does to literal 7.62 machine guns. Pretty bad comparison on your part.
It doesn’t… but aight. Maybe the Brit’s should invent some APHE
Remind me, weren’t you the one bringing in false information, that you conjured up, to save your OP vehicle from going up in br?
They used it too
1 Like
Btr is way worse than the fox in the bounce regard, it’s actually far closer to the XM800.
The btr also has some stupid bar that blocks are shooting to the rear of the vehicle below -1 degree of gun depression. The fox doesn’t, in fact, it has what? -15 ? -14? Degrees of gun depression?
But there is only a .4 br difference from the fox to the btr, which is insane to think. Especially because the xm800 preforms better at 8.0, thus the fox should since there’s more light tanks no? But then stabilizers would balance the fox problem, same with its pen being nerfed or others being buffed. (As was discussed already, either other auto cannons under preform or fox over preforms.
Very very rarely
It was optional for almost every round, mostly those from lend lease
1 Like
Where are these facts?
If you dig a bit you’ll find the RARDEN is underperforming
4 Likes
If you dig a bit, you’ll find the 2a72 under preforming