Dude I’m telling you I hit him in all the spots you should, it just keep saying non-pen, not she’ll shattered, and I kinda panicked after the 3rd shot XD
Im guessing it will have equal or lower pen than all other 30mm guns, but massively lower fire rate compared to them all. Im guessing the BTR will be a more powerful IFV after the nerf
What do you call the Bradley then? I thought it was trash, but I dropped a nuke the other day. I just sat on a cap and kept spamming ATGMs, and the light tanks got annihilated by my 25mm auto cannon.
I think the problem there is just Gaijin at that point.
Got Gaijined as I put it.
See I don’t agree with that. The fox should have more pen due to how the data shown has said, but 110mm vs the 82mm of a btr doesn’t make sense.
If it was 94 and 82mm that makes more sense for the initial velocity difference, and would account for the long range drop off of the Rarden given it’s projectile weight.
I call the Bradley a free kill (mostly because american players dont tend to use them well, akin to germans and their marders). I dont really play the US higher BRs so cant comment on the other side, others think they do well though.
Its arguably superior to the Warrior though.
More than likely, but the T26e5 is no slouch moral of the story. M46 is pretty good too, pretty quick, good gun, lacking useable armor against anything running an 88mm or bigger.
The first Bradley’s armor is thinner than the sandwiches they hand out in Air planes and has ammo loads bigger than my mother, just shoot the thing and it explodes.
You got a nuke in a Bradley … OHHH WELL IT MUST GO UP ! … wtf are you on about. The Bradley is fine where it is. it’s not getting you a nuke every single game, you played it to its advantage against a team too stupid to smack you with HE. its fine at it’s BR. At this rate it’ll be easier for you to say what doesn’t need to go up.
And yeah, nuke in Bradley, neat, I got a few nukes in the G6 and Ratel 20/90s, are they all vastly OP? xD
See I don’t mind either IFV, the marder is a bit harder to use the atgm, but bother have their pros and cons. I do find it funny the Bradly is still where it is, but it’s probably based on stats, but again, another vehicle I believe should go up in br.
Just because you get a nuke doesn’t really mean the thing is super good, there’s a lot of luck evolved and a lot of very specific factors
Eh it’s 50/50.
You have to have a fairly potent vehicle to get a nuke.
Have you ever gotten one in a OBJ-248 or obj. 246?
Or any case mate for that matter.
I don’t have either
Would the G6 count as “good enough” in that? It has a very limited frontal arc of fire like a casemate tank does. Also nuked in the STRV 103s before too.
Also memed my AVRE into nukes as high as iirc 10.3 so far. AVRE to 12.0? Technically works fine there xD
A very limited frontal arc you say ?? MOVE THAT BADBOY TO 9.3 !
Often what people fail to see though, is just because something stands out as good, that doesn’t always means it’s OP either, it could simply mean that thing is good at the very spesific thing it was made for, or the vehicles around that area either 1: suck or 2: They’re vulnerable to what that thing was made for.
Usually things that are very good at one thing, absolutely suck at everything else, the fox is TRASH at killing anything that isn’t already lightly armored if they already see or hear it first.
This is because it was built for scouting and flanking to kill stuff if it needed too.
Its good at what its designed to do… go figure ? XD
Kinda of the point, if the thing is good at flanking, look around for them at their BR and you’ll get some free kills