There’s no way it should be 8.3 … what the same BR as the Turm 3 with an auto loader, decent mobility and an actual autocannon used by the falcon… The guys absolutely dreaming.
oh yeah, no doubt about it. Im looking forward to the “Torando Gr4 needs to be 14.0 because Brimstones” thread sooner rather than later if that leak becomes true.
2 Likes
14.0 if your lucky… they’ll just move the entire British tech tree to 20.0 at this rate, Fox, Falcon, Za35, Scimitar all crown’d at the top as The kings of Exploiting Situational Awareness…XD
1 Like
I agree if they were at a proper BR.
I don’t complain about the Xm, because it made for a better aa than anything,
The fox is great all rounder. Out preforming all its cousins.
I really don’t understand this, the fox would be BETTER if they moved it up, the Leopard 1s would be shaking and crying as I pen straight through their turret with my stupid little 30mm as I already do with the Warrior.
Not only that, but also whyyyy???
Every time I see the fox it’s just a free kill with just about everything I play.
The Fox is nothing more than annoying in most situations.
2 Likes
8.0 is too low, just as 7.7 is for the fox.
All other IFVs and the lien are higher, unless we consider the RCV, or the XM, which is now 8.0
Turm 3 could also go up in BR, it’s super dominant.
1 Like
That’s pretty much the case when i play the falcon, i love an uptier because it just invites light vehicles to kill, down tier’d you start facing the real heavy boys like … yehh aint killing that… looks like im AA today XD
1 Like
It would also be better balanced, and have higher rewards. So I don’t know why so many people disagree. Clearly is performance is outstanding.
1 Like
So then why do you disagree?
because its balanced where it is, in an up tier and a down tier.
It’s realistically has to stay where it is, if they move it up it can easily bully everything because that’s when most nations start ditching high armor for high speed, and if they move it down the damn thing will just murder everything for not having enough armor because they’re WW2.
7.7 is where shit like the IS-4M is, what is that little baby gonna do to that?
The answer is nothing and I know that because I used to main it for a while and the Fox was a free kill with just a little bit of .50 cal.
It is not in the slightest balanced at 7.7, it has almost double the turret traverse of any tank 6.7-8.7, has one of the highest speeds for these brs, and although it’s not a super fast firing gun, 80-90 rpm is pretty usable. It’s better than 6-8 rpm no?
It’s like the argument of an AA vs an IFV or APC. The AA will win because it has double the guns.
Other light tanks all suffer from other tanks with auto cannons, because it allows follow up shots against them quicker, this is universal.
But with the qualities that the fox has, there still is no reason for it to be 7.7, it should be 8.0, or, counter point, we make it 7.3, and remove its APDS.
in your opinion …0.3 BR lower than the warrior with ATGM’s thermals and composite add on armour … OK
1 Like
Is-4m, maus etc.
The maus is the only thing I really couldn’t kill with the Fox… or so I thought.
I had some funky spall thing happen on the inner fender of the maus, then it pierced and hit his ammo and killed him. He called me a hacker lol.
Warrior should go up too.
A lot of the 7.7 - 8.3 super potent vehicles need rebalancing in every nation.
Hey everyone we have a fun vehicle to play … LETS NERF IT INTO THE GROUND SO NOONE PLAYS IT ANYMORE!!! … you ain’t an ex hell divers 2 balance dev by any chance ??
4 Likes
Okay I just know this person is rage baiting at this point
4 Likes
omfg XD the warrior should go up too THERE IT IS looool 20.0 everyone Britain is tooo stroongk
2 Likes
Define “fun” most “fun” tanks for people are the ez win unbalanced, unfair tanks, such as the T26E5 as a great example.
1 Like