I am providing you why the information they could find would be negative to a certain platform, or not. Regardless, most cannon rounds are managed by algorithm, and the negative aspects of the Russian cannon generally can be expected to result in these differences. But in this case, if it were to be manually changed between these two, your BTR would still function worse. You can pretend the facts are on your side all you want, but you’ve been corrected a half dozen times (that I can count briefly) in this thread already.
Reloads are a balancing feature, otherwise several NATO platforms would have improved reload speeds. Oh, and the reloads of autoloaded Russian tanks would go up by around 3 seconds across the board.
So what warrants the Aubl 74 HVG to be 8.0? And the fox 7.7?
Fox has a better load rate, higher damage round, is faster, smaller, better armor.
The Aubl has a full stabalized gun, 6.0 sec reload aced, far worse acceleration, can quite literally be 7.62’d from the sides and frontally, is only marginally quieter, has a lack of gun depression in comparison (even less over the drivers hatch and behind the vehicle).
(Aubl) Yup penetration and a full stab, but wickedly worse effectiveness compared to a 7.7 vehicle (fox).
There I’ve compared it to a different vehicle, happy? We are no longer using the closest comparison.
fox should be 12.0, i mean i have seen your videos how you catch oblivious players and shoot them on the side of theyr tanks and they die. we cant have that happen, the fox should only be able to pen spaas.
