Cry more bro honestly
5 Likes
At no point have a said the fox was performing poorly mate.
Again reading comprehension.
Ive stated all these other ifv/auto cannon.mounted vehicles perfromance is even more strikingly good in compared to how the fox performance at its own BR.
Secondly @Hartsy1 y who actually knows thw vehicle better than corrected the statement with a more indepth answer and a more efficient statement.
Screenshot what you like it wont change the fact of what has been said.
3 Likes
not the russian/soviet ones though lol, i don’t see you complaining about the 2S38 or KV-1E
3 Likes
Smell just an incy wincy bit of anti-british bias here, don’t you?
7 Likes
In referal to the last statement you made earlier no, british tanks in reality have been some of the most cutting edge of their times.
Dont know why youd say irl they are not…
Unless you, yourself are trying to again cause more problems. @moderators hes now trying to again derail the entire post and its becoming somewhat irritating to see a man insult the machinery and by effect the men who worked on and with them.
Dudes going on the attack for british stuff.
Tagged the mods cause its unacceptable to try cause an argument where he knows finewell there are a lot of people here that will bite.
So nah dont engage with it man
3 Likes
I haven’t reported any of your posts at all. Even the one with a man standing on the warfrokt with a damn abrams, which was unacceptable and also completely off topic.
Or the fact youre deliberately trying to garner an argument, tagged the mods and subsequently tried to insult all the folks who are either british or fans of the equipment, not only insulting the service men and women of the country who served on and with the equipment bit also the people who developed it.
And wonder why so many people are reporting your stuff?
Lmao sure those definitely seal club. So happy the KV1B wasn’t brought up, since it doesn’t face high velocity guns :)
Your comments are very biased, I’ve shown this before.
I never said you did. I bet Baltic does a lot tho haha. And a photo of a modified abrams is a problem now? Wowwww.
I mean, unless you can re-write history, there are many many bad choices and bad vehicles the Brit’s have made.
I’ll lock the thread for now as it has severely gone off-topic despite multiple moderator comments being made to not make it go that direction.
17 Likes
Well, since they reopened it, I’ll give my opinion. I don’t think it’s Op, I think it’s a combination of things. The first would be its speed, which makes it arrive extremely early to key points of the map. The second is the mediocre design of the maps, which makes that in many cases reaching a certain point of the map makes you have a huge advantage. And the third would be that since the damage and penetration model is an absolute failure, it makes that in some tanks the bullets bounce senselessly in certain situations, especially in recent tanks (new bugs unfixed). As for the gun, I don’t have much to say, good penetration but ridiculous rate of fire, added to mediocre precision, so I don’t see the gun as something with that much advantage with respect to the other 30 or 25mm guns.
4 Likes
*ridiculously low rate of fire, but yes.
3 Likes
It must also be recognized that it is realistic, since that cannon had that rate of fire, what I do believe is that the cannon admitted two clips, which means that if they were putting clips on it when the first one was used up it could maintain the rate of fire, in the same way as the 40mm bofors, so there would be no reload time, unless the magazine was lost. Another thing would be the precision between shots, since it chose this system of reloading and recoil of the weapon so that sustained shots would not affect the precision, since it caused the recoil to be absorbed making the vehicle almost not move, whereas in the game it moves too much.
Its penetration compared to other auto cannons is too high. It seems to over be over preforming. If you care to read the whole thing to find where that was proven.
It’s either all other auto cannons underpreform such as 2a72, or the rarden over preforms
As I saw some time ago, the penetration of the rarden was modified by a report, where in the technical data they gave this penetration, the difference is that the rarden ammunition loses too much penetration at distance, while the soviet 30mm cannon maintains much more penetration, being that the two projectiles weigh the same, but the rarden has more speed.
I don’t know if the penetration of the automatic cannons is well modeled, but I am inclined to think not, since for example the 20mm cannon of the marder, wiesel, etc. has in its APCR and APDS at least between 10 and 20 mm less penetration than it should, so I am inclined to think that the penetration calculator works particularly badly with small ammunition.
2 Likes
Yes I think the 2a72 should be penning about 92mm if the rarden is doing 110mm at 10 metered distance
Gonna need a source on that.
Also, just me or is shell shatter happening a lot more on the RARDEN APDS?
The RARDEN is actually weaker than it really was BTW. they were penetrating Iraqi tanks frontally in the gulf war.
2 Likes
I almost never got any until this update