Under >Preferences >Users
You will find options to block / ignore
4 Likes
This guy is the top G!
Yea I figured that out after a few messages from him
It was the main reason why I told dude to find it by himself if he is actually interested
You’re the one claiming that bug reports are not going to fix anything because of “reasons”,…
I asked you to back it up, and you won’t do that, therefore your earlier posts should simply be hidden for badmouthing about Gaijin company.
And this one should be about badmouthing me,…
Someone claiming shit on forum : you can see that EVERY DAY on various platforms
If you can’t back up accusations, then keep them out of the forum.
To be fair he’s decently active in bug reporting himself, specifically for Japan. Many reports here do not go through for lack of sources, as the Japanese tend to be rather secretive.
So when you do add all publicly available sources and still get hit by “provide more sources” it is essentially telling us to basically leak classified information or just accept inaccuracies.
Sometimes there is also issues such as certain gaps in Type 10 armor present in game that can be disproven with our given source material, but are denied because we lack sufficiently detailed description on how they would be set up correctly. This once again leads to a very unpleasant feel of helplessness when it comes to certain issues in the game.
So while simply bug reporting can help and should always be the first option, especially with modern and often classified technology we simply cannot always do that. There is no known right option, just assumptions that strive to be as close to the source material, while not being disproven by it.
Our only real hope is to make these issues and our displeasure known to get Gaijin to revisit certain aspects individually, using a more complete library of source material collected by the community here to create a more accurate assumption then they did upon release.
So reading such issues being dismissed by a fellow player can be fairly insulting.
2 Likes
Well to be clear, i’m not dismissing anything.
I was asking to see such behaviors past or current, and i didn’t asked them all, a single one would have been enough.
As said before:
If we come to consideration that his post was a vain try to feedback an eventual problem, the reaction would have been more constructive.
And yet, still in order to make his post becoming a Feedback post, instead of the current claim post with no clue, having an exemple would have helped both me, and eventually Staff, in order to ensure better communication in within Bug-reports thread made on platform, and eventually up to here on forum, when we see around some " #Fixed n°xxx " devblog post being all but intuitive.
I had several objectives, from obtainning such exemple,… and instead, we ended up in a bullshitery arguement on my own sanity → which is Out of Forum Rules.
I also happenned to do Bug-reporting in the past, mostly around some French Air Vehicules, and such behaviors weren’t present back in the days.
Moderator told you to block me, do that and stop annoying both of us with your silliness
Ever heard of burden of proof? If not then google it.
1 Like
Wasn’t he answering to you, when he gaves you that possibilty? (EDIT: nope he was answering to a 4th guy)
I’m trying here to have a debate,… i’m trying here to bring discussion,…
Yet you classified me as a burden,… i’m not going through the “blocking you” process as i don’t think it is currently needed.
Same goes @Necronomica,… if you guys don’t wanna discuss, then why are you guys on a forum?
Anywho back to the topic at hand, I’d really like to see arh missiles on the jh7a cause they only take up the bomb pylons and therefor shouldn’t affect its battlerating in ground now that the battle ratings are separated. I’m gonna keep bringing this poor plane up till somebody else who’s a fan comes along.
1 Like
Anti-Radiation Homing missiles? (Magnum call)
or
Active Radar Homing missiles? (Fox-3 call)
i mean the JH-7A could carry both type of weapons,… so i don’t know which ones you’re talking about (might be a bit confused here)
Didn’t mean to reply to you oops, but both I guess they’re the same missile with different seekers
oh, so you’re talking of both PL-12 (Fox-3) and LD-10 (Magnum).
Well, currently the game is not going to add any Anti-radiation missile, so that settles it.
i do think that PL-12 is possible, but this will not makes the JH-7A seriously better (i don’t think so at least).
It’s a surprisingly amazing dogfighter, its only limitation currently is that it only has short range missiles so I think it would massively improve it.
😐 go away cave troll. Germany hasn’t gotten anything cool top tier. Just the Russian have me downs.
4 Likes
ICE is cool but thats just all about it has lmao
1 Like
germany should be getting polish f-16s
Not polish but argentinas
No.
1 Like
Why?