Someone just sent a report to need J-10C without a reliable source, they just accepted it
8 Likes
The problem lies in the way the company deals with Chinese vehicles in general. Strangely, all vehicles, whether tanks or aircraft, are in the top ranks of the game, and all their information is classified. However, for some dubious reason, we see strange treatment of China. For example, when the Chinese JH-7A aircraft was first added, there were numerous complaints that it could carry at least four Kh-29s. However, all these complaints were dismissed due to a lack of information. But when the premium version of this aircraft was added, the four missiles were included without complaints or evidence. The same thing happened with the Russian 38 missiles; six of them were added to Russian aircraft without any explanation, even though the missile is real. So how can a Sukhoi aircraft carry six of these missiles? This is the point: the company adds and removes without any standard or stable system. This creates the feeling that they are deliberately marginalizing the Chinese market because, to this day, China does not possess an effective close air support aircraft like the US, Russia, or Israel. Even its tanks have many easily solvable problems that remain unresolved. The worst air defense system is the one with the upcoming upgrade, but it shares this characteristic with Israel. However, the difference is that Israel’s problem is the shortage of vehicles. China, on the other hand, possesses air defense systems, for example, the HQ-16, which is similar to the Buk system currently in Russia’s arsenal, but it hasn’t been added for no apparent reason. Sorry for the length and any errors; I’m using a translation program.
15 Likes
If it’s brochure from manufacturer it’d be considered a primary source.
6 Likes
that was as reliable of a source as available without a leak. just because youre mad that its a slight correction/nerf doesnt make it fake
I use brochures from manufacturers for MOST of my own bug reports as they are second best to only a manual or blueprint itself
Unless it’s a Russian vehicle that isn’t a Mig-29 or Rafale related, bug reports seem to be denied no matter what. Even if they aren’t denied, they are often ignored entirely/never fixed (see spall liners for Chinese top tier tanks, many things relating to the Typhoon/Aim-120).
See if that brochure mentions something about the WS-10B being installed and use it to make a report about the new engine.
6 Likes
You think ground and air is bad for inaccuracies, hoo boy, wait til you see Naval.
2 Likes
All sources posted in bug reports are hidden because someone might post classified stuff and they dont want that to be spread on their website.
1 Like
So what course is it? CCTV? AVIC Chengdu?
They said it was a brochure. So most likely from the makers of the jet.
You could try to find the player and ask them for it.
How do I find him?
Their username is on the bug report
Is he gotta answer? Is he gotta delete the issue? Is he gotta make them to go back?
His choice. I dont know.
Assuming the source is correct, why would he try to stop it?
You don’t see sources, they are only visible to bug reporter and Gaijin’s stuff, unless bug reporter attaches them into screenshots section.
So why don’t they show us? The source is fake? Or the source is the top secret?
The reason for that is private collections, on some sources people spend their own money and don’t want to share them for free. Although it would be nice if you could make that section visible for others if you want.
3 Likes
they used to, then people kept posting classified or restricted documents on the bug report site they they got rid of it so they dont get in trouble for making classified/restricted documents public
1 Like
Doesn’t this directly violate the principle of not using confidential information?
2 Likes
If it’s confidential, then why use it? If it’s not confidential, then why not make it public?
4 Likes