Man, imagine the massive shake up of low tiers if we had historical ammo.
To be honest, I think it could do some good. There should be a breakout for the 2 pdr in Rank II when it gains late ammo.
that would impact the Sweeds more than anyone, And honestly? GOOD.
Their damn tanks are just volumetric hell.
Their damn 1.0s even are just immense pains in the ass to kill.
its sad when a vehicle with 20mm of armor, is harder to kill than a Matilda or Churchill.
1 Like
The chi ha LG can do that to pretty much every vehicle in the game with few exception…
Because we are not allowed to have fun /j
Hell nah. Let that to US main, no need crap tank. I would consider AEC Armoured Car than a shitty copy paste tank.
I hope to see Churchill mk.1 back to 3.0
The British named Locust and got more use out of it than the Americans, arguably it should be Researchable in both TTs. A captured or Egyptian Locust could be added to Israel, if their low-tier is ever added.
2 Likes
You do realize the M22 was developed for the British right?
And they were the ONLY ones to use it in combat during WW2?
5 Likes
Honestly its a crime the M22 isn’t IN the British tree.
It was legit entirely developed for the British by the American’s, the Americans had no intentions on actually using it.
1 Like
This is why. I was sitting in their spawn btw, not even seeking cover. Let’s see you do that with a valentine.
Good players have good games. Vehicle performance is the more important metric.
4 Likes
Yes and no need in ther British tech tree.
Valentine Mk XI with the M61 Aphe, new demon in 2.7 next update.
Ts gonna be 3.0 or even 3.3 in Nov
Just take the momentum before the raise
Ngl is just hate how slow it is, I would just play the Crom or church
Same thing as vehicles like the Chieftain MK10. Only the good players play mediocre tanks, and make the stats inflate to levels that aren’t accurate. So they get moved up, and that just makes the problem worse.
“Armor” - KV-1 at 3.7 can lolpen its lower plate. Not to mention every early long-barreled Panzer IV at 3.3-4.0 also exists.
“firerate” - It’s a 2-pounder at 3.3. It doesn’t have “Decent” ammunition. It can’t even kill a KV-1 anywhere and can see 4.3. At best, you’re squeezing out 89mm of penetration on a 40mm in a tank that moves as slowly as super heavies while fighting the best versions of the Panzer IV. Even the Sherman’s 75mm APHE can struggle against the Panzer IV with track armor, so what do you really expect a Churchill with a 40mm going, at best, 28kph to do?
Not to mention that the 76mm howitzer is a gimmick while you seem to think it’s some meta protection device. Smoke Shells have never been more useful than just shooting back with a lethal round, especially when your tank moves so slowly. This Churchill, in its current state, is not a brawler. The KV-1 can’t die to it, and every 3.3 vehicle is a hard counter.
I get tired of your horrible balance takes. The M4A3(105) Sherman has a better armor profile at a slightly lower BR with way better mobility.
3 Likes
IMO the Churchill III is also dog shit and go down a BR.
3 Likes
The Churchill 3 is alright, but yeah.