There still have, and ppl that know the impact of these arent really in good form. You think aphe isnt realistic enough, but from the poll, most do think it is
1 Like
Haha, it seems like gaijin is suggesting that people vote no, “we are going to do a test but it will take a lot of time, so we won’t be able to add new things or fix other bugs in the game”, all they need to say is that it will take a month and that the game won’t be playable during the work.
Well, what people believe is that if their APHE is touched they won’t be able to kill easily.
No i think it’s made by the illuminati. Let’s be serious 2 seconds, if they would that players vote no, they wouldnt do the poll and never touch it, and vice versa, they would act as if the poll said yes if they would
I don’t think the poll shows people believe APHE is realistic. I believe the poll shows people don’t want to lose their easy button. People don’t want to have to aim.
4 Likes
If we were serious, the first thing is that this vote would have been done 8 or 9 years ago, or as I said before, there shouldn’t even be a vote, it should have been changed 8 years ago, so there would have been time to adjust it correctly. I seem to remember that no one voted for the change of the ATGMs, but they were changed, when it is a weapon that causes much less imbalance than the APHE.
It’s easy to say conclusion like that without knowing why did they vote. They could also vote because they would rather gaijin to focus on other features than this very change. I could also Say that yes voters would this because they would their tank less worse than tank with aphe but i dont coz i know there are lot of justification possible
It’s confused, you say that gaijin should have not done the poll, but then you said gaijin should have ask for atgm. From what i readed, the rework has been already few times put on the table, and it’s still not passing
Also i dont think the poll is bad because it allows player to decide some direction that their game would take, it’s great
Isn’t that what you did by assuming people voted no because APHE was realistic?
I’m not guessing, I’m basing it off posts in the thread. I want things to perform properly. Part of that is APHE having realistic post pen and part of that is not having a shot to the back corner of your turret kill the driver.
1 Like
No, i voted no because i would rather gaijin to focus on other features than this very change, and also i think the problem is more other ammo being to creepy than aphe being too good
1 Like
It’s not confusing, it’s just funny. For something that needs to be changed no matter what, a survey is conducted, but for something that doesn’t need to be changed that much, they simply change it without giving the option to choose whether to implement it or not.
But APHE is over performing. We know this for a fact. It is physically impossible for APHE to perform as it does in game.
1 Like
Erm did i forget a part of the poll? It’s like most players voted that it wasnt the first change to do, it’s not because you think it is that everybody thinks it is
Maybe, i wasnt in tank during world war so idk, and tbh i have never asked myself this question in 7 years of wt, and i dont think everybody that vote yes did it also before gaijin ask if it is, i just think there are more importants thing to do, and i said it because gaijin would my opinion
Well I know that’s not true because I’ve been part of discussions about APHE. You don’t need to be a tanker during WWII. We have documents that show in great detail how APHE works.
There are documents, but the buff (the part we cant vote) isnt from a document ? And the problem of this very precise documents that gives data for very precise shots is that it is very precise, you’re never gonna sim super realistic shell in 0.5 tenth
The question is, why wasn’t this vote done 8 years ago? Why don’t they do a vote for all the changes to the game?
This picture is literally from one of the documents I’ve talking about.
According to some persons in this topic, the subject has already been brought on the table, and i guess it had never been accepted, for the second awnser it’s because if they would do it without asking to players it’s sure that it would have got revenge from players, so they they let us choose and i think we should just accept that we can choose, i dont see any problem in that
I readed the article no worry i believe you when you say there are documents. But you’re not gonna have exact shot as simulation because it’s too long to simulate