Please fix US 90mm gun on pershing (s). US T33 shot should be able to UFP a german panther tank at 1000m. And HVAP at 1500 (inconsistently at up to 2500m) although I can only find tests done at up to 800m.
7 Likes
That’s not how that works. As has been said in the hundred other “US 90mm suffers” posts, penetration for all guns is determined algorithmically based on material, geometry, and velocity. If any of those are wrong that’s something to discuss l, but simply “buff mah penetration” isn’t going to work, nor should it.
Because manually creating the penetration values for every shell at every angle and range would be impossible, and picking and choosing a few to manually buff or nerf wouldn’t be fair.
5 Likes
bruh. thats BS.
1 Like
It’s fair realism is what it is.
People can’t complain of bias if they use mathematician-physicist equations for penetration.
1 Like
am I reading that right??? he is complaining about the 90mm shell and his evidence is not supproting his arguement, bc it wasnt tested that far.
ive heard of cases of 90mm HVAP penning panther UFP at up to 2500m but I cant find solid evidence
isnt that what those pentation simulators you see on youtube do?
If there is not such evidence there is no point in adding it. it might have happened in the war due to material imperfections so I would take it with a big grain of salt.
its not like you cant check the claims more or less by yourself, you can look up the formula´s to calculate it.
exactly, and that leads me to another point, I think in old war thunder they had a mechanic that took into account the softness and inconsistency of the tiger 2s armor, it would be funny if they did that with the t34 hahaha make it almost unplayable with your armor breaking all the time.
had the us heavy tank that serious problems after the war???
for some clarification: T34 is the us heavy tank and T-34 is the Soviet midium tank…
no no, im talking about the soviet t-34 not the US T34 I should probably specified that haha
I´ld like to have some historical matchmaking in which every teavy tank excels…, then I want SARH dominance by the us and allies, and some good old r73 which counters it bc the soviets had far superior IR-missiles(doesnt feel like ingame, but was the reason for the aim9x development)
That would be great. And have no CAS to ruin you game when youre on a kill streak.
They sort of can considering that Gaijin themselves decided on;
- Which formula to use.
- The values for each constant.
- which characteristics to use as variables (e.g. the APCR calculator uses overall projectile weight, not penetrator (slug) weight).
- There is no separate calculator to account for design decisions e.g. Blunt nose or capped projectiles.
Each of which has varied impacts on how similar performance is to known data for the actual designs since they were designed with things that aren’t said specific calculators in mind.
5 Likes
cas is only a hightier problem, its only a agm spam, which is hard to stop when the cas player is using some elevation as cover making most of the spaa´s useless. lowtier has not such problems.
I dont know about you, but i get killed by planes all the time
also, what do you think of changing the m26s class to heavy and making it 5.7?
you could do the same with the panther, put it at 4.7-5.0 and enjoy your new heavy tank