THIS SENTENCE IS FALSE
eh?
Oh, is it not receiving its stealth? If so, I feel bad now, if it is, nah, f them.
Will sweden gwt the patriot missle system because they do use it in real life
So, let me get this straight - you believe that because Pantsir was the best at the time, it should be removed and NATO countries should get a far, far better system instead?
So vindictive shit rather than actually attempting to balance by giving NATO an equivalent SPAA?
5 Likes
you have to wait until Gaijin brings the Su 57 and then for technological “parity” the F22, which will have to fight with old missiles against the newer plane bc incompetents on the russian side
almost everyone in NATO uses it.
I think you misread.
New missile VS new missile type
1 Like
Shameless plug 👉👈
2 Likes
Also what happened to no conflict references? I wonder where from that su34 cinematic was inspired from
7 Likes
Sweden joined nato, like, last year.
Edit: this year, march this year, the 7th IIRC
Noticed that. We get locked for politics and current geopol references but…
1 Like
They have had patriot far longer than that.
That was my point.
What are you on about? You had four Su-25s compared just recently a third A-10? Meanwhile everyone else is stuck with a shitbox Tornado. Oh look, Gaijin’s adding another but it’s coming pre-nerfed like almost all NATO vehicles do.
bruh lol
“This is a work of fiction. Any similarity to actual persons, living or dead, or actual events, is purely coincidental.”
-Future Smin forum post
4 Likes
So your mad that you won’t have the most OP plane in the game for quite a while to come essentially?
2 Likes
I haven’t said, that non-NATO countries do not have the Patriot (Ukraine as an example)