Fiat 6616 (RH202)

[paolgand1975-psn]

+1 we need it
there was also a 25 mm prototype with the oto tc 25 turret, similar to the one used on the M113 A2 DK PNMK M92

[LukTroy]

+1, since we got the type 87 RCV prototype. This shouldn’t be that much different.

[OpusAudereSemper]

+1 it would be very fun scout

[OpusAudereSemper]

absolutely we need this, you should make a suggestion for it !

[Hetaeron]

This vehicle would be nice to put it at BR 6.7 in the normal technology tree. We already have the version with the cannon we are missing the one with the 25mm machine gun

[Hetaeron]

Retired Danish IFV model with a 25 mm cannon in an OTO Melara turret.

[AspandaIV]

+1 obviously

There is one weapon that is missing that the 6616 utilized, UB-32 rocketpods salvaged from downed Mi-24’s

[YaSen]

@EddieVanHalo

never used prototypes

This version is actually mass produced.

[EddieVanHalo-live]

Ok I accept that but I don’t enjoy the game play from either side.

[blazeFox]

Magah Hydra Vibe, it would be funny.

Also there are no reason why we don’t have Fiat 6616 Rh202 already in game, this is so obvius car to be add

[Hetaeron]

I had no idea they had done such a thing, this version with missiles could be put as a premium vehicle for italy, while the normal one would be fine in the tech tree.

[Nicholas_Concu]

@EddieVanHalo

As an Italy player the game at 6.7 is horrible, this fast 70s stuff is no fun especially unmodded. To face it all in a WW2 tank is terrible as well so it is a big no from me to bring more of this junk into the game.

I dont think you understand that the game has never been about historical scenarios where vehicles face each other based on the date they were first made/seen. I dont see your reasoning making much sense.

@EddieVanHalo

but I don’t like the inclusion of these never used prototypes in a WW2 game.

If you had read the post, which to me makes it clear you did not, this was not a prototype and saw mass scale production and even export success. It was widely used in Italian service so it has every right to be seen in game.

[EddieVanHalo-live]

@Nicholas_Concu

I dont think you understand that the game has never been about historical scenarios where vehicles face each other based on the date they were first made/seen. I dont see your reasoning making much sense.

I dont care what the game was (it was ww2 and two sides in fact) I care about how bad it is now and how much worse it is getting

@Nicholas_Concu

If you had read the post, which to me makes it clear you did not, this was not a prototype and saw mass scale production and even export success. It was widely used in Italian service so it has every right to be seen in game.

I read the post I voted no and I said why. That is it .I hate these things in an era of WW2 tanks. They ruin the game for me.

[blazeFox]

Blockquote

@EddieVanHalo

I dont care what the game was (it was ww2 and two sides in fact) I care about how bad it is now and how much worse it is getting

So with your logic this game should have only WW2 planes

[EddieVanHalo-live]

@blazejpolito

So with your logic this game should have only WW2 planes

No that’s just your bad English

[blazeFox]

I have found internal schematics of 6616 T20

[Nicholas_Concu]

To note, that is of the prototype :)

[blazeFox]

Yes, but turret don’t change much

[DarkLordMagus]

Another photo of the Somaliland militia’s FIAT 6616 with a rocket pod. And hilarious sloppily-painted “whitewall” tires.

And Peruvian 6616 with a Malyutka launcher:

Should these each be separate vehicles, or should the basic 6616 get them as unlockable upgrades?

[Th0r94]

should have already been added to the tree a while ago i feel. +1