The bug report managers don’t think it’s a bug
Otherwise why they gain it Not A Bug?
They could very well not be aware of the massive change, thinking it has always been like this, or think that the missile change was intentional ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
In that case you would as a moderator just defend what exists currently, thinking it’s supposed to be like that.
1 Like
his point is that the snail thinks it’s supposed to be that. I’ve seen him elsewhere in this forum and I know where he stands.
Oh, we have an official message stating that the pull change is intentional? I have been thinking it was an unintentional bug all this time
Officially they wouldn’t issue such a blatant message though. I’m just interpreting what yiehgd thought by saying that quote. Quite sarcastically imo.
And they have been constantly suppressing “bug reports” regarding the PL-12 nerf with nab/nei these days. Granted they were not entirely strictly bug reports, but it has served as a more direct method to voice the discontent and protest as opposed to this forum. And suppressing the voiced discontent over the PL-12 nerf using technicalities can indicate that they intentionally did the nerf.
A writer once wrote, “if we don’t rise up from silence, we will perish in it.”
5 Likes
See the Chang log from Gaijin
If I understand this correctly it means the missile more stable means it stability is better
Why they investigate instability now?
Should that word be completely opposite of “stable”?
And if they are investigating the instability, then admit there is a bug. Why they directly gain every issue relate to PL12 a Not A Bug?
Just accept one and there will be no additional bug report need to be sent
Not saying intention but very interesting
1 Like
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/SKtrVa4yAzz8
Ahhh, classic, “NoT a BuG”, :|
If the maximum g-force achieved by the top-tier Chinese ARH is only ~18–22G and that’s not a “bug,” then what is it?! This is either an obvious error in the rocket’s data during the latest updates or a deliberate action to harm this nation in War Thunder—it’s some kind of nonsense. The bug reporting department isn’t even able to provide a comprehensive explanation; they just close the threads without any explanation…
We have to provide official data that is sometimes so hard to obtain because it’s military equipment, yet when they’re asked about the changes made, they don’t explain anything, won’t show any documents—they just close the report and that’s it… Double standards.
ARH AIM-7M lol
3 Likes
Tuffffff
AIM-7P Sparrow, PL-12 have data link.
PL-12 Sparrow🥲
2 Likes
At least they don’t need to proof RVV-AE is R77
Things come to China:
Proof PL12AE (E for export) is equivalent PL12A
1 Like
I remember when the CM502KG came and had only the HE warhead,saw ppl pointing the SAP-HE warhead of it,they all replied " theres nothing showing SAP-HE warhead on CM502KG ",i got the missiles brochure from CPMIEC,and after such a long time i just got a “devs decided not to add SAP-HE”…if was somekind of nerf they wouldve accepted instantly…
1 Like
what exactly happened with PL12s i havent used them since last update ? i dont really play toptier anymore as its become a horrible mode
basically they got their pull/amount they can turn cut in half, it’s about as bad as amraam.
and now they can be out rolled like sparrows
WHAT how? what did they use to justify such a change
check this
they did it to increase the range (very slightly)
1 Like
we are entering R27ERs level bs
3 Likes
lmao real
Fr it’s so sad and I lost all faith in gaijin that it’ll never get unnerfed which is sad because China is my favorite air nation, and I can barely play it now
1 Like
both AIM120 and PL12 are victims of Gaijin’s discrimination, we shouldn’t fight each other, but fight Gaijin who transfer the rage toward itself to a direction in between players. we should stick together
7 Likes