FB-10(A) Guidance is Incorrect

(another similar topic exists, though it doesn’t expand on it more)

IN MY OPINION, GIVING IT THIS VERY SLIGHT RANGE ENGAGMENT BUFF IS FAIR AS IT ONLY OPERATES AS 1 VEHICLE.

The FB-10(A), by all known sources of information, uses Radio Command in addition to Imaging Infrared. In the case of the FB-10(A) on the Type-625E, it uses the Infrared when the Radio Command lock is broken (either at will or mistakenly) or during terminal phase. An example of this in action would be;

You lock said target →
While target is locked, you then fire said missile →
(In this scenario we’ll simulate a hard lock, keeping the target within the tracking radar’s scope scale. If you were to not originally lock with radar, it will instead use its infrared seeker the entire time)
Missile then burns until within appropriate distance for IIR to track sufficiently.

In short, the missile would operate more similarly to the IRIST-SLM platform, and since this is a single vehicle I don’t think letting it use it’s very maximum range is such a big deal, especially since other SAMs are getting very good buffs (IRIST-SLM).

TLDR: THE FB-10A USES RADIO COMMAND/ UPDATE COMMAND TO HELP GUIDE THE MISSILE UNTIL IT REACHES TERMINAL PHASE, IN WHERE TI THEN SWITCHES TO IIR.

For my sources, I will be using a Chinese equipment supplier, which SHOULD be fine because Gaijin uses similar sources for the IRIST and especially the Pantsir.

http://www.cndefense.com/admws/FB-10A.html
image

4 Likes

Also, in addition to the original message, the FB-10A and HQ-10 are known to be VERY similar. The HQ-10 had very obvious antenna that protrude from the missile, which very well signifies this class of missile is very much capable of radio command updates.


I’m also curious because on the HQ-10 the transceiver looks like this:
image

I’m not much of an expert in missile engineering, but would this be the antenna on the FB-10A or just something to measure speed/ smth else? Correct me if I’m wrong, it just looks very much like a radio reciever.
image

It’s gonna be pretty useless against helis if they don’t add this feature. Especially if they don’t give it it’s ahead.

It currently has around 10km against planes and just 4 against helis.

The current implementation of the CSSA5 is strongly disappointing. Every time I access the dev server to inspect progress on new top-tier SAM systems across nations, the CSSA5 stands out with shockingly low completion:

  • Its FB-10A missiles remain unusable—even after unlocking and equipping the modification, they revert to FB-10 in-game.
  • Critical capabilities are missing for both missile types:
    • Image-recognition targeting (IIR) ✘
    • Data-link functionality ✘
  • Lock-on range against top-tier helicopters with IRCM drops below 3km (vs. realistic 8-10km).
2 Likes