“It’s been confirmed”
Yeah, when? Gaijin has promised a lot of things, but have not always delivered. They gave American three F-18s with plenty of ordnance, they didn’t have to make up some bollocks about giving Finland the original F-18C. There is no good reason, because who is actually playing the game being like, “it’s a darn shame I cannot play the F-18 with no bombs, like Finland did at the beginning!” Because if they did, you can just tell them to carry a payload without GBUs.
Russia is not that good, just because you are personally bad at the game and don’t know how to one shot the easiest MBT to one shot, that’s on you. Leopards are far better than the T-80 and T-90. Leclerc has a much shorter reload time, as do the Type 10s and Challengers, you get better armour on all Leopards. American tanks are great too.
Unlikely, gaijin has made it clear missiles are the only meaningful difference otherwise we would’ve gotten Gripen C after the December update instead of them saying the were postponing it until it had more differences that were meaningful. So Fox 3 was the only difference at launch…420k rp for 1 missile.
Same A2G as the Gripen A not even the historical C model Radar or anything that made it a C model even now its a A model primarily so your logic of different radar and such is false. And as we currently have seen inferior vehicles can and will sit at the same BR. So F-18 with AESA radar with the same missiles as MLU 2 can sit at the MLU 2’s BR while still using the old AN PG radar.
You have the Tor for China, ItO 90M for France and Sweden, FlaRakRad for Germany. All great SPAAs. Again, not that difficult to point a missile and shoot it at a jet that can hardly turn. The F-16s and F-15s can climb into the stratosphere with ease, that thing can hardly look up without bleeding speed.
Looks at Sweden top tier ground that has remained top 2 for over 4-5 years now.
Yeah they totally always get screwed in every regard.
Ironic coming from the person saying that the F-16C is overpowered, when mavericks are legit some of the easiest missiles in game to shoot down for SPAA.
sweden has been good in air only once with the gripen, early viggen was great for a time but thats it
2 Likes
The air bias existed for 2 months with the Gripen A only to become irrelevant once again. Ground stands strong so air must sufffer
exactly
Ground sure, it’s great. But air? Oh boy, obviously you never played Sweden. Half decent props, early jets are slow and by the time you reach the battlefield, everyone is gone, everything from 8.0-11.0 is absolute garbage, and your only saviour until the Grippen is the MiG 21bis. The AJ and AJS are probably the worst strike aircraft, because somehow you need to replace your bombs with flares. So you’re giving up at least two pylons (8 bombs, 2 rocket sylos, or two AGMs) for much needed flares (or even cannons), and for whatever reason, the strike aircraft version gets the AIM 9Ls ripoff, and not the actual fighter.
I’ve played Sweden, I know how it works.
half decent props? swedish props are absolute dogshit, j21s are a free kill
But hey, two BF-109s, and that VL thingy. But I can think of a few worse nations for props, Israel for example.
Pre finland it was Trauma inducing, remember ther 20k j29 and the 15k j21a2? repair cost was unhinged
Don’t remind me. I remember playing top tier Sweden back when the highest thing was 10.3, and we had to fight the F4S.
1 Like
ive never got to sweede top tier, playing it as f2p long before economic update burnt me off from the entire tree. without a doubt the worst air tree in the game for me
1 Like
ItO 90M has like a 7 km range against a flanking Su-34 and sometimes you get missiled outside of your max range. Kh-38s are very hard to intercept since they are really quick and the range you can lock these missiles gives you a very narrow window to intercept them and sometimes your proxy won’t trigger on them but with ADATS you have more luck as the IRST can lock the Kh-38s earlier and the proxy is more reliable.
If the Su-34 player is in any way capable the aircraft is virtually untouchable against AAs except for the Pantsir. In addition it is way harder to protect yourself against Kh-38s as they have IOG and potent warhead for overpressure (smoke gives minimal protection and overpressure is likely for lighter vehicles)
Honestly the only NATO AA that I would want to see added is a CIWS system like the Phalanx as that way there would be a way to defend yourself and your teammates against these missiles
Lol really it was a sole reason turn me into air spawn camper with Gripen hah not that good my a*s it the only CAS that need to be put down immediately as they spawn 10sec slower they can f over six people no cas in the game can pull that BS
1 Like
Playing Swedish air burnt me out too. I went weeks without playing just because of how much it irritated me. I would only sign in for the rewards and then go back to play Battlefield. Only reason why I went back in was just so I can finally finish Sweden and be done with it since I was a completionist. Yeah, now I’m top tier in five (about to be six) countries, so much for the “get this done and I’m quitting”
Oh, I agree, we need better SPAAs. All countries do. I’m just glad at least one nation can bully CAS players, unfortunately for everyone, it’s the Pantsir. They need to buff the FlaRakRad again, bring it back to when it was supposedly OP.
Gladly I don’t main the US even if I’m a American. It can get boring after a while.
Yeah tbf NATO CAS (excluding the Rafale which I think is on par with Su-34 in terms of CAS) is also an actual problem but it has to be spammed out a bit more meanwhile 1 or 2 Rafales/Su-34 can cause catastrophic damage and sometimes you’ll have Russia and France on the same team