F/A-18C needs more long-range AG weapons

They’re also easy to smite on 200 from Aus. Though the game sometimes gives them victories they didn’t earn because round just goes poof, but until Oceania servers, best I got. (The other server isn’t real)

Britian’s entire ground TT basically ends at 10.7 these days

1 Like

I still try to play Chally sometimes.

Most of the emphasis on try, it isn’t very fun.

Yup, could be niche but fun, but instead its depressing. 10.3 has been my main BR recently.

I would wager it would be fixed with longer ranged maps, or if we could dig our own holes and hills to fire from + some improvements to the strikeface of the turret and mantlet.

Ready rack fixes + dozer blade are the 2 main buffs im after at the moment, but thats getting off topic

1 Like

forgot to mention that a second one is coming this update, and it never used them, but that’s okay, even though this game claims to model everything historically from primary sources. but Sir! The Yankees have been getting away with injustice!1!1!1!1!

1 Like

Yeah, shall we start counting how other nations have historical inaccuracies because the American mains cried about it, or are you just going to casually forget about the Brimstone debacle? I mean, it took how long for the OTOMATIC to get APFSDS, and even then, it still doesn’t get the proper mags. Then we had the Mirage premium that didn’t get Magic 2s until recently. MiG 29s are not modelled properly (they should be on par as the F-18, if not better). The Russian missiles are not modelled properly. Then we have Britain who gets shafted every time we get something, such as the Harrier T-10 not getting BOL pods “for balancing issues” (just forget that the A-10 is constantly at a BR where they’re fighting flareless jets at 9.3). Oh, and the TTD is supposed to be equipped with a 120mm cannon (5 120mm turrets were created), as well as a 140mm cannon, but that’s not in the game. Solid Shot works terrible in game, while in real life, there was virtually no difference between Solid Shot and explosive filler (hence why Britain hardly used explosive filler). HESH rounds don’t work properly, and have been complained about for years.

Meanwhile, when Americans cry for a buff for their already excellent aircrafts and tanks, they get it. The only exception is the ADATS, but that’s because you cannot throw the PATRIOT system on the back of a Ford F-150 and call it a SPAA.

Not long, seeing as it got them on release. Here is a video from 6 years ago of the 1.85 dav server, which was the update which added the Italian ground tree. Just skip to 4:29 and see what modifications it has:

Spoiler

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EUkgcprfbw4

beepbeepbeep my bullshit detector went off again. Here is another video, this time from the Apex predators update 2nd dev server (2 years ago). Skip to 1:53 and tell me which missiles you see in the modifications:

Spoiler

This text will be hidden

Okay so:

  1. Same as German and Russian mains, but looking at your biases you will likely just deny that these complaints and likely even the buffs ever happened.
  2. Not entirely true. People complained about wanting a better armored Abrams. Gaijin giving the Abrams a reload buff was not something the people asked for or wanted initially. Hell I think a lot of people would happily have the reload buff reverted if it means getting the Abrams fixed and adding a properly armored Abrams as a 2A7/122 counterpart.
5 Likes

I love those BR’s along with 7.3 because of the downteirs. Sometimes 8.3 but that depends on how the day is.

It used to have apds or smt

What? You talking about Mavericks? They’re miles away from being broken and also they’re not KH38’s and the F16C dominating Ground Realistic battles era is long gone.

4 Likes

Kh-38 and AASM are better than Mavericks.

US a2g is consistently screwed over at every turn.

F-15E was added the update before. We got nothing for air in december

This is too much cope in the other direction though. US A2G has been really dominant in the past, just like Russian A2G is dominant now.

1 Like

I’m talking more about really dumb stuff like no EGBU or LJDAM on US jets. And no Laser GBU-39.

And when ppl complain about US CAS I don’t think they realize that the game is just barely scratching the surface of all the stuff we could get.

You call it crying, we call it complains and they must exist since so many bugs and unnecessary additions were implemented either wrongly or not added at all.

But go ahead buddy, Germans can cry over the 2A7 having less hull armor.
Russians can cry over not having FnF missiles for their Helicopters while having the best ATGM called Vikhr.
Russians can cry over the bad reverse speed and bad reload while the second best tank and the best Ground lineup ever.

But when an American player suggest an issue like bad armor on the Abrams or Hellfires are so slow or Mavericks are from the 80’s he get attacked and he’s crying.

5 Likes

Also barely scratching the surface of the Russian arsenal.

Though they do tend to get cooler things before everyone else which is slightly peeving, AASM would have been nice earlier, but we have them now. Except the big one.

Does Russia have anything like the CBU-105 or GBU-53?