F/A-18A and AIM-7P(lack of)

I was made aware that only the F/A-18C(early), an 80(eighty) USD premium, will receive the AIM-7P SARH missile. The main advantage of the P over the F/M sparrow is the improved seeker with datalink capabilities, which helps it not go dumb right after launch - a very common issue among non-datalink SARH missiles with a CW seeker.

The problem here, however, is that the F/A-18A does NOT get the AIM-7P, while also now being the same BR as the C(early) on the dev server. Why did Gaijin have to put a paywall on US TT’s best SARH missile?

It honestly baffles me how there’s outrage about the R-77-1(A whopping 15% difference compared to the base R-77), thrust vectoring(A very niche and not very useful mechanic in actual dogfights), F/A-18C being 14.0(A plane with a very good radar and ten of the best ARH missiles in the game), but the AIM-7P being exclusive to a very expensive premium plane AT THE SAME BR AS THE TECH TREE VARIANT is completely ignored. Did everyone just pre-order the pack so it doesn’t affect them? What’s going on?

And no, the C(late) having the AIM-7P doesn’t count - because at this battle rating you’re already using the AIM-120, which makes the aforementioned SARH missile completely irrelevant, since the AMRAAM is better in every single way.

8 Likes

Honestly F/A-18A at 12.3 may be even an option.
As i know inboard AIM-7 pylon isnt really historical

that would be really good, kinda like a sidegrade to the F-4EJ kai: more AoA, turn and the ability to carry more IR missilse in exchange for far worse acceleration, energy retention and less flares

Early service (1980 ~ 1983) and pre Operation El Dorado Canyon 86’s ~ Gulf War 91’s

Or AIM-7P (Block II) instead AIM-7P on F/A-18C Late

i’m not sure, aim-7m and a good fm for 1v1 makes me feel like at 12.3 it would be similar but better than the mirage 2000c’s at a lower br

1 Like

With 4 aim7 and 2 aim9l it would be fine.
Or 2 aim7 and 6 aim9l
Mirage has way better IRCCM missiles, F/A-18A has more missiles

Also, you wont meet 1x1 in Air RB. Also mirage is faster

2 Likes

there are tons of planes that have weapons they never carried irl, 7P for the A hornet isn’t that bad compared to some other planes

a model doesn’t get 9m’s? i missed that no with 9L’s thats fair.

It did IRL, but it would be better to add without them rn

9Ms would ruin the plane, it’s gonna have to be 13.0 and at that br it’s just going to get sucked into the 14.0 hellhole almost every match

F/A-18C Late new medium-range Air-to-Air Missile AIM-120C-3 or AIM-120C-4 instead AIM-120B, and receive AIM-120C-5

Gajin set F/A-18A armament pre AIM-7P service and pre integrate Paveway II & Paveway III LGB

This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.

it should be “eighty(80)” I think

Sorry, my speech eng not very good. but gajin not add AIM-7P on F/A-18A

As it stands right now, you are functionally researching the same missile twice on the 18A as the F and M are nearly identical bar the slight guidance lockout bonus the M has.

The 7P is currently in the same exact boat as all it’s stats are identical bar it having IOG (which is going to be removed) and DL which will just allow it to re-acquire targets for longer.

As it stands right now, the 7P is a minor if best upgrade to the 7M and F which are already identical in function.

I see no reason currently for the A to not get 7Ps, or at least have the 7F removed from research so its not just a direct detriment to it’s grind.

From a A2G perspective as well, I also see no reason as to why the A should not be 12.3 if it stays as is. The C early is trash at 13.0 but the A is irrelevant if the C early exists at 12.7, and as already stated, there are aircraft at lower BRs with vastly superior weapons to the A already like the premium Mirage F1.

1 Like

tbh, F-4EJ Kai don’t have it’s AAM-3 so F-18A is more like Su-27, but with worse missiles and better radar

+1 give AIM-7P to F/A-18A