F/A-18 Hornet (Legacy): History, Performance & Discussion

Pratt & Whitney is not General Electric, General Electric may state the installed static thrust rating for their engines but I am not sure. I’d need more confirmation for specific cases. In the meantime I can test the acceleration of the F-15E with F110-GE-129 to see if it matches known data.

For example, at 30k feet it should reach 1.06 mach in mil thrust after 280s accelerating from 0.4 mach.
At 40k feet, it should accelerate on maximum thrust from 0.8 mach to 2 mach in just 96 seconds.

I’m not reporting anything atm, I was just saying that I could try to obtain documentation relevant to his question.

In regards to the F-18A we can look at the acceleration charts in the manual.
360 knots IAS to 550 knots IAS (0.54 to 0.82 mach) should take approximately 10s at sea level with a gross weight of 26,000 pounds when clean. That would be with ~3,000 lbs of fuel. Min fuel for the aircraft in-game gives it about 3,100 lbs of fuel.

TL;DR the F-18A in-game has the correct acceleration for sea level 0.54 to 0.82 mach. It seems Gaijin matched the thrust and the acceleration quite well to the real world performance.

I don’t know why the video looks so grey / bland. Some issue with my monitor and the HDR settings for recordings I guess.

There is also no loss of thrust at angles of attack in the game.

I swear to go i wonder if people claiming the aim120 is that good even play the game. Its good but its main strenght really only works againdt bad players. Top tier isnt bvr for the most part

I wonder if people who claim the aim-120 isn’t really really good even play the game.

On paper and in practice it’s not, so what’s your point? There are worse missiles but that doesn’t mean it’s “good”. Only by comparison.

Its average, the only reason you think its stronger is because its by far the most common fox 3. Any fox 3 that isnt derby or r77 is better in practice imo.

PL-12 has some issues right now that need addressed, not sure why. After 10km they seem to not function properly on occasion. That is an outlier, of course.

unironically the j11b is the coolest aircraft of the new bunch, imo might grind china just because we got some dope flankers coming with j16

Of the vehicles that are underperforming I think the Chinese flankers will be some of the worst offenders once new models with improved engines and better radars come.

wdym?

There is little data on them, so they will perform simply as well as the Russian planes or maybe a bit worse.

I got classified documents proving that the fa 18 overperforms a lot… cannot share it though obviously. Hopefully gaijin knows this and will nerf when the hype dies down as they usually does.

Maybe youre just mistaking words or idk
Because in fact it underperforns in STR.

It’s strength is low speed AOA no?

It is but not as seen in game lol

in fact it does.18± deg/s instead of 19.2 on 60% fuel 2amraam 2sidewinder

What source do you have that claims 19.2 all the sources I have seen claim 18 or so and therefore its correct.

one of US reports.

https://www.gao.gov/assets/nsiad-96-98.pdf

Gaijin says it’s incorrect

gaijin can say a lot of stuff to be incorrect, even if its not wrong…

it is.